Turn business evidence into decisions your team can review

Start with the exact brief structure that matches the job, then keep that work connected to later business artifacts.

The same source pack stays available across brief mode, recommendation work, and decision artifacts made in Gixo Prism.

Before execution, Gixo grades source quality, missing inputs, evidence strength, and likely review risks.

Required checks, human-review warnings, and output risks are attached to the workflow before it is delivered.

Move from checked context into options, criteria, trade-offs, and a decision-ready recommendation draft.

Keep options, scores, confidence, and reversal conditions explicit instead of burying decision logic in prose. Standalone decision artifacts are made in Gixo Prism with a Prism plan; in Business the decision logic sits inside the Consultant report.

Prism provides visual matrices, pyramids, funnels, and other frameworks. This separate product requires Prism access; it is not included with Business alone.

Add standards or regulations as context without mixing them with your evidence.

Your preferred terms, prohibited words, and voice rules are applied automatically.

One request can fan out into connected briefs, decks, recommendations, and decisions with dependencies preserved. Decks in a pack are made in Gixo Lumen and decisions in Gixo Prism, each with its own plan.

Briefs are sized to the recipe's target range and adjusted to fit.

Download as PDF or DOCX, or share with a link.

Upload or connect up to 10 source files for a brief, or write one from the request alone. A brief with no sources has nothing for the number check or citations to work from.

A new brief starts on Only my sources. Choose My sources + the web to let it search, optionally limited to trusted domains you name. In Ask Gixo Business you can also connect up to 5 public webpages as sources.

Where a brief has sources - files you upload or connect, pages you add, or the search results web research drew on - a repair stage compares the figures in the paragraphs, lists and table body cells of the draft with the numbers in those sources, and rewrites any sentence or cell whose figure it cannot find there, substituting the source value or dropping the claim. A table heading or row label is read as context, not as a figure, and a total, difference or share the table works out from its own cells is never rewritten. That is reconciliation against your own sources, not an independent fact-check, and it is silent: nothing is marked up in the delivered brief, and a sentence it cannot repair, or a draft it cannot finish, keeps its original figures. For a brief written from sources you upload or from the search results web research drew on, the Evidence tab under Checks in the brief editor lists up to five sentences or table cells whose wording or figures it could not match to those sources, for you to check. It matches wording and exact figures, not meaning: a faithful paraphrase, or $8.1M where the source says 8,100,000, can fail to match while being true, so an unmatched sentence is a place to look, not an error, and a matched one is not confirmed either, because this is a comparison with your own sources, not a fact-check. It reads only part of a long source (24 passages of up to 1,600 characters) and at most 12 sources, files first. Of web research it reads the title and snippet of each search result, not the page, so a figure taken from the page alone does not match, and if it could not read every result the list is advisory. It reads a table cell with its row and column, and a total the table works out from its own cells passes when the arithmetic holds. It checks the draft as generated, not your later edits. Treat every figure as needing review until you have confirmed it at the source.

When your request names a brief type outright, such as a renewal brief, the planner puts that recipe first instead of choosing a format from what your sources look like.

A Consultant recommendation can become a Business Case with governance and approval controls, up to 5 financial scenarios, and, once approved, a decision memo you can download as a PDF or open in the browser.

Analyst dossiers and Business Cases carry a claim-level evidence review: each claim, metric, quote and conflict from the evidence pack is listed for a reviewer to decide, and open claims and conflicts block a case from approval.