Sign In Try Free
Workflow-specific products Content, decks, briefs, proposals, legal, and sales each have a clearer buying path.
Review before delivery Draft, edit, collaborate, approve, and export in the same workspace.
Security + procurement path Security policy, support, and Azure Marketplace buying are public.

Fundraising readiness assessment

Investors run the same audit on every deal: story, traction, market, economics, diligence. This free assessment runs it first — scoring all five on a deterministic 0–100 scale and handing you the gap list while it's still cheap to fix, not three weeks into a partner process.

Run the assessment — free Open the Data-Room Checklist
No signup. ~10 questions, 5 dimensions, deterministic scoring. Same answers, same score.

The five dimensions investors actually audit

Each dimension is worth 20% of the score. Every answer maps to a fixed value — the instrument scores the evidence, not the pitch.

Story
Is the problem narrative unclear, partial, or coherent? Is the use of funds a vague total, spending categories, or milestones — "this money buys these proof points by this date"? Milestone-shaped use of funds is the difference between asking for runway and selling a plan.
Traction
What's your strongest traction metric — none, interest, revenue, or repeatable revenue? And can you show retention evidence: none, early, or measured? "Repeatable" and "measured" are the states that survive a partner meeting; everything else is a story about the future.
Market
Is the market sizing absent, top-down ("1% of a $50B market"), bottoms-up, or validated? Is your ICP broad, segmented, or focused? Bottoms-up sizing with a focused ICP scores highest — it's the version an associate can't dismantle in one spreadsheet.
Economics
Is the financial model missing, static, driver-based, or scenario-tested? Are unit economics unknown, directional, or measured? A driver-based model with measured unit economics means you can answer "what happens if CAC doubles" without a follow-up email.
Diligence
Is the data room nonexistent, scattered, organized, or investor-ready? Are legal and finance records unknown, carrying issues, mostly clean, or clean? Deals don't usually die in the pitch — they die six weeks later, in this dimension.
Then: the bands
Not Ready (0–39): raising now means raising on hope. Emerging (40–59): the narrative exists, the evidence doesn't. Close (60–79): fix the two or three named gaps before first partner contact. Ready (80–100): your materials would survive diligence as-is.
Gixo Fundraising Readiness diagnostic result showing a banded score across story, traction, market, economics, and diligence with a gap list

A real Fundraising Readiness result: the banded score, all five dimension scores, and the named gaps to fix before investor contact.

Run the audit before the people with term sheets do

Fundraising readiness fails quietly. The deck gets polished for weeks while the data room stays a scattered folder, the model stays static, and the use of funds stays "18 months of runway." Investors notice in reverse order: the unglamorous dimensions — diligence, economics — are where processes stall after a promising first meeting. This assessment weights all five equally precisely because founders don't.

The scoring is deterministic: "data room: scattered" maps to the same value for every founder, every time. That makes the result a progress meter you can re-run monthly during raise prep — and a shared instrument for co-founders, who frequently discover they'd answer "legal cleanliness" differently. That disagreement is a finding; better to have it now than in a diligence call.

The output is a gap list, and most gaps are documents: a milestone-based use-of-funds plan, a bottoms-up market sizing, a retention evidence summary, an organized data room. That's the paid side of Gixo — the Business workspace generates those briefs from your own uploaded files with claims bound to sources, and the free Data-Room Checklist playbook gets the folder structure right before you spend a credit.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the fundraising readiness assessment free?
Yes — free, no account, no usage cap. It's a deterministic instrument: fixed questions, fixed answer values, five dimensions at equal weight. Run it as often as your answers change.
Who is it for — what stage?
Any founder preparing to raise within the next two quarters. The dimensions are stage-agnostic: a pre-seed raise is judged on the same five families with different thresholds of proof, and the gap list tells you which evidence is missing at yours.
What do I get at the end?
A 0–100 score with a band (Not Ready / Emerging / Close / Ready), per-dimension scores across story, traction, market, economics, and diligence, and a gap list naming what pulled the score down — each gap mapped to a concrete next step or document.
Does Gixo see my answers or my company data?
The assessment runs without an account and your answers are used to compute your score. Nothing is used to train any model — the scoring engine is rule-based and doesn't call one.

Know your gaps before the partner meeting

Ten minutes now, or six weeks of diligence surprises later. Run the audit investors will run anyway.

Run the free assessment