Frame the decision
Name the audience, requested decision and source pack. Review imported tables and extracted text; record gaps instead of allowing a polished narrative to conceal them.
Turn source material, meeting notes, or a rough outline into a memo that is easier to review and share. Gixo helps you draft internal updates, executive notes, policy announcements, and project memos without starting from a blank page.
Inspect an actual Business report. A readable decision brief needs the question, supplied evidence, options, assumptions and next decision—not just a shorter source document.
A decision, options compared on stated criteria, risks and a roadmap, with statements in the analysis labelled Fact, Inference or Assumption. The decision, lists and some summary sentences carry no label.
Business question: Which actions should a small business that stores customer personal information take first to protect it and to be ready if it is exposed? Decision maker: The owner of a small business. Timeframe: The next quarter. Context: A small business collects customer personal information and keeps it in paper files and on computers. It has no dedicated security staff. Refer to it as 'the business' throughout and do not give it a name. Options: Take stock of the personal information it keeps and where it is stored; Reduce what it keeps to what the business needs; Lock down the information it keeps with practical safeguards; Prepare a plan for responding to a data breach. Criteria: How much personal information at risk it removes or protects; How realistic it is for a small team without security specialists; How well it limits the harm if information is exposed. Constraints: No dedicated security staff; Limited time and budget.
Open the full export and compare its statements with the cited sources before reuse.
Name the audience, requested decision and source pack. Review imported tables and extracted text; record gaps instead of allowing a polished narrative to conceal them.
Separate supplied facts, calculated values, assumptions and recommendations. For variance work, reconcile the period, unit, baseline and actual value before interpreting the direction of a difference.
Use options, trade-offs, risks and named next actions. Review the final artifact and, when using Analyst calculations, inspect the calculation evidence separately from the narrative.
Select source documents, case context, working notes, assumptions, options and decision constraints before generation. Inspect claims, metrics, exact quotations, source tables and conflicting figures. Review decisions are scoped to the source or artifact and can become stale after evidence changes; unresolved evidence should stay visible.
Keep investment, recurring costs, benefits, delays, growth, discount assumptions and scenario probabilities explicit. Inspect deterministic cash flow and the available return, payback and sensitivity outputs. Compare scenarios before selection, and inspect the formula workbook or calculation receipt separately from the narrative recommendation.
Inspect the dossier's source tables, working rows and columns, calculation ledger and workbook handoff. Metric packs retain reviewable calculation and source context. Preview source replacements for a new period before accepting them. Execution records distinguish an action owner, baseline, target, measured value, data source and the reason for a status change.
A calculation can be replayable while the supplied inputs remain wrong. A generated report is decision support, not independent diligence, audit assurance or investment advice.
Whether you need an internal update, a decision memo, or a policy brief, Gixo handles the structure and formatting so you focus on the message.
Add your organization's preferred and banned terms to your Brand Dictionary. The multi-stage pipeline applies them to every memo automatically, replacing banned terms with your preferred wording so the language stays consistent across all internal communications regardless of who wrote them; it does not check tone or formatting.
Structure memos with KPI blocks for metrics, Checklist blocks for action items, Steps blocks for procedures, Pros/Cons blocks for options analysis, CTA blocks for decisions needed, and Comparison Table blocks for alternatives. Each block maintains professional formatting in PDF exports.
Quick AI provides three instant actions on selected text -- rewrite, simplify, expand. Ask Power Edit to fix grammar or change the tone. Power Edit opens a full AI chat dialog for deeper rewrites. Review the proposed wording before replacing the selection, then recheck its figures and citations against the sources. The generation checks do not rerun on these edits.
Every memo passes through drafting, word-count and structure checks, your Brand Dictionary terms, number repair when the brief has sources, readability optimization, a chart-data check, citations and a Sources section when you upload files, a normative references appendix when you name rules or standards, and an evidence check after generation. Each stage runs automatically; the conditional ones run only when their inputs exist.
Claims your memo takes from the files you upload receive inline [1],[2] references with a complete Sources section. When leadership questions a metric or market figure, the source is already embedded in the document -- no scrambling to find where the data came from.
On Business Professional or higher, authorized colleagues can comment on and review the saved memo. Reuse its source context for the next cycle, then update the period and facts; resolve save conflicts before distribution. Describe the memo your reader needs and intended audience, add the sources you want to use, and review the proposed outline and missing evidence before generating. Export polished PDFs for distribution.
Enter the subject -- a decision, project update, or policy change. Describe the memo your reader needs and intended audience, add the sources you want to use, and review the proposed outline and missing evidence before generating. Upload source documents for number checks.
The pipeline generates your memo, attempts to reconcile your figures against the source documents you uploaded, applies your Brand Dictionary terms, requests model-generated [1],[2] citation markers with a Sources section when you upload files, and runs an evidence check on the output as generated, across several automated stages. Number reconciliation can retain original figures when repair does not finish. Inspect citation markers and source passages before sharing the draft.
Structure your memo with 20+ semantic blocks -- KPIs, Checklists, Steps, Pros/Cons, CTAs. Use Quick AI's three instant actions for rapid edits or Power Edit for deeper AI-assisted rewriting of any section.
Use comments and saved-draft review on Business Professional or higher where the current content role permits. Update the sources for recurring memos, check the final figures and citations, and resolve save conflicts before exporting for stakeholders.
Compare the speed and quality of AI-generated memos against traditional writing workflows.
| Evaluation area | Gixo Business | What to check in manual memo writing and general AI assistants |
|---|---|---|
| Job and inputs | Draft the memo around its reader, decision, evidence and requested next action. | Test the current product or scoped service against the same question, sources and deliverable. |
| Evidence review | Inspect source coverage, uploaded-file citation markers and generated-draft Evidence and citation findings. | Check source support and current research capabilities; a citation alone does not confirm the conclusion. |
| Revision and delivery | Edit the brief, retain saved versions and review the final export. | Test the actual review, collaboration, version and export workflow you need. |
| Timing and responsibility | Generation time varies with the job and source pack; accountable people review the result. | Compare the agreed scope and review responsibilities rather than assume fixed speed or price. |
For a brief written from sources you upload or from the search results web research drew on, the Evidence tab under Checks in the brief editor lists up to five sentences or table cells whose wording or figures it could not match to those sources, for you to check. It matches wording and exact figures, not meaning: a faithful paraphrase, or $8.1M where the source says 8,100,000, can fail to match while being true, so an unmatched sentence is a place to look, not an error, and a matched one is not confirmed either, because this is a comparison with your own sources, not a fact-check. It reads only part of a long source (24 passages of up to 1,600 characters) and at most 12 sources, files first. Of web research it reads the title and snippet of each search result, not the page, so a figure taken from the page alone does not match, and if it could not read every result the list is advisory. It reads a table cell with its row and column, and a total the table works out from its own cells passes when the arithmetic holds. It checks the draft as generated, not your later edits.
Updated