Frame the decision
Name the audience, requested decision and source pack. Review imported tables and extracted text; record gaps instead of allowing a polished narrative to conceal them.
Create structured strategy briefs with AI. From growth planning and market entry to digital transformation and organizational change, draft strategic analyses with supplied evidence, options and proposed next steps for review.
An AI strategy brief generator organizes supplied context, goals and time horizon into a draft executive summary, situation/SWOT analysis, options, proposed recommendations and next actions. Business provides supported sections, terminology checks and bounded source-review findings. Reconciliation can retain original figures and numbered markers can be missing. Review the evidence, assumptions and recommendation before use.
Inspect an actual Business report. A readable decision brief needs the question, supplied evidence, options, assumptions and next decision—not just a shorter source document.
A decision, options compared on stated criteria, risks and a roadmap, with statements in the analysis labelled Fact, Inference or Assumption. The decision, lists and some summary sentences carry no label.
Business question: Which actions should a small business that stores customer personal information take first to protect it and to be ready if it is exposed? Decision maker: The owner of a small business. Timeframe: The next quarter. Context: A small business collects customer personal information and keeps it in paper files and on computers. It has no dedicated security staff. Refer to it as 'the business' throughout and do not give it a name. Options: Take stock of the personal information it keeps and where it is stored; Reduce what it keeps to what the business needs; Lock down the information it keeps with practical safeguards; Prepare a plan for responding to a data breach. Criteria: How much personal information at risk it removes or protects; How realistic it is for a small team without security specialists; How well it limits the harm if information is exposed. Constraints: No dedicated security staff; Limited time and budget.
Open the full export and compare its statements with the cited sources before reuse.
Name the audience, requested decision and source pack. Review imported tables and extracted text; record gaps instead of allowing a polished narrative to conceal them.
Separate supplied facts, calculated values, assumptions and recommendations. For variance work, reconcile the period, unit, baseline and actual value before interpreting the direction of a difference.
Use options, trade-offs, risks and named next actions. Review the final artifact and, when using Analyst calculations, inspect the calculation evidence separately from the narrative.
Select source documents, case context, working notes, assumptions, options and decision constraints before generation. Inspect claims, metrics, exact quotations, source tables and conflicting figures. Review decisions are scoped to the source or artifact and can become stale after evidence changes; unresolved evidence should stay visible.
Keep investment, recurring costs, benefits, delays, growth, discount assumptions and scenario probabilities explicit. Inspect deterministic cash flow and the available return, payback and sensitivity outputs. Compare scenarios before selection, and inspect the formula workbook or calculation receipt separately from the narrative recommendation.
Inspect the dossier's source tables, working rows and columns, calculation ledger and workbook handoff. Metric packs retain reviewable calculation and source context. Preview source replacements for a new period before accepting them. Execution records distinguish an action owner, baseline, target, measured value, data source and the reason for a status change.
A calculation can be replayable while the supplied inputs remain wrong. A generated report is decision support, not independent diligence, audit assurance or investment advice.
A strategy brief moves from where the business stands today to what to do about it. Gixo generates each of these sections through the same multi-stage pipeline, checking figures against your uploaded sources.
| Section | What it answers | How Gixo generates it |
|---|---|---|
| Executive summary | The one-page takeaway for leadership | KPI + summary blocks, Brand Dictionary terms applied |
| Situation analysis | Where the business stands today | Figures checked against your uploaded sources |
| SWOT / framework analysis | Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats | Comparison Table blocks; applies SWOT, Porter's Five Forces, BCG, Ansoff |
| Strategic options | The realistic paths forward | Side-by-side Comparison Table with cited evidence |
| Recommendations | The prioritized call to action | Ranked recommendations tied to outcomes, timelines, metrics |
| Evidence & citations | Where each number came from | Automatic inline citations, traceable to source |
| Step | Action | Time |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Enter the strategic question and upload source documents to a workspace | ~1 min |
| 2 | Choose a focus area (growth, market entry, transformation, org change) | ~30 sec |
| 3 | AI runs the multi-stage pipeline: generate, check word count and structure, apply Brand Dictionary terms, check figures and add citations when you upload sources, run an evidence check | Minutes |
| 4 | Refine in the 20+ block editor (Quick AI / Power Edit), collaborate, export to PDF | As needed |
Generate structured, evidence-based strategy documents ready for leadership review.
Draft an analysis of the growth levers, expansion assumptions and revenue strategies supported by your evidence. Business attempts source-number reconciliation and requests numbered markers; original figures and missing references can remain. Check market definitions, periods and whether each citation supports the proposed strategic claim.
Evaluate new market opportunities with entry barrier analysis, competitive mapping, and go-to-market recommendations. Use Comparison Table blocks to present side-by-side market evaluations with sourced sizing data.
Plan technology adoption, process automation, and digital capability building with Steps and Checklist blocks. Use Quick AI for instant rewrites or Power Edit for deeper revisions as the roadmap evolves.
Structure briefs for restructuring, team alignment, and change management. Brand compliance keeps terminology consistent through your Brand Dictionary, while Business Professional or higher supports comments and saved-draft review for authorized stakeholders. Resolve save conflicts and confirm the reviewed version before acting on it.
Ask the draft to apply a strategic framework suited to your question, such as Five Forces, value-chain or portfolio analysis, and use comparison sections to organize the reasoning. Review whether the chosen method and supplied data support the conclusions. Number reconciliation and citation markers are bounded aids; they do not verify every data point or strategic interpretation.
Ask for proposed priorities, outcomes, owners, timelines and success measures that fit the reviewed strategic question. Business drafts the sections, attempts source-based number reconciliation and surfaces generated-draft citation findings. Inspect unrepaired figures, missing references and assumptions before accepting the recommended actions.
Enter the strategic topic — market expansion, competitive response, digital transformation, M&A evaluation, or any strategic planning need.
Choose from growth strategy, market entry, operational efficiency, innovation, organizational change, or a comprehensive strategic analysis.
The multi-stage pipeline generates content, attempts to reconcile your figures against the source documents you uploaded, requests model-generated [1], [2] citation markers, applies your Brand Dictionary terms, and checks word count and structure before delivery. Number reconciliation can retain original figures when repair does not finish. Inspect citation markers and source passages before sharing the draft.
Edit with 20+ semantic blocks including Comparison Tables and KPIs. Use Quick AI for instant rewrites or Power Edit for full AI dialog. On Business Professional or higher, authorized colleagues can comment on and review the saved brief. Resolve save conflicts and confirm the reviewed version before exporting.
Compare AI-generated strategic analyses with traditional consulting approaches.
| Evaluation area | Gixo Business | What to check in internal strategy work and consulting workflows |
|---|---|---|
| Job and inputs | Organize supplied strategic evidence, options, risks and proposed next steps for review. | Test the current product or scoped service against the same question, sources and deliverable. |
| Evidence review | Inspect source coverage, uploaded-file citation markers and generated-draft Evidence and citation findings. | Check source support and current research capabilities; a citation alone does not confirm the conclusion. |
| Revision and delivery | Edit the brief, retain saved versions and review the final export. | Test the actual review, collaboration, version and export workflow you need. |
| Timing and responsibility | Generation time varies with the job and source pack; accountable people review the result. | Compare the agreed scope and review responsibilities rather than assume fixed speed or price. |
For a brief written from sources you upload or from the search results web research drew on, the Evidence tab under Checks in the brief editor lists up to five sentences or table cells whose wording or figures it could not match to those sources, for you to check. It matches wording and exact figures, not meaning: a faithful paraphrase, or $8.1M where the source says 8,100,000, can fail to match while being true, so an unmatched sentence is a place to look, not an error, and a matched one is not confirmed either, because this is a comparison with your own sources, not a fact-check. It reads only part of a long source (24 passages of up to 1,600 characters) and at most 12 sources, files first. Of web research it reads the title and snippet of each search result, not the page, so a figure taken from the page alone does not match, and if it could not read every result the list is advisory. It reads a table cell with its row and column, and a total the table works out from its own cells passes when the arithmetic holds. It checks the draft as generated, not your later edits.
Updated