These guides explain how to use Business without choosing an output type too early.
Follow a sample source pack from intake through review-ready delivery.
OutputsSee the briefs and recommendations Business can produce, and the decisions and frameworks it routes to Gixo Prism.
Jobs to be doneChoose a board, fundraising, market, operating, or consulting workflow.
StructureReview the available report, decision, diagnostic, and framework layouts, with framework artifacts made in Gixo Prism.
GovernanceUnderstand source quality, uncertainty, verification gates, and human approval.
AnswersGet clear answers about the source pack, workflow, outputs, and next step.
Ask Gixo Business proposes the route, source forecast, planned sections and review checks. Brief Mode builds the outline from your goal and selected material. Review the plan; changed inputs need a fresh plan before queuing. Private source selection needs eligible Business access, and connected app sources need configured permissions.
Open Ask Gixo BusinessInspect candidate evidence and conflicts, generated-draft Evidence findings and current recorded source decisions. Extraction and matching can miss important claims. A recorded rejection or stale decision is still a decision, and clearing those checks does not establish truth or automatically satisfy formal case approval. Recheck material claims after editing.
Understand the evidence-review limitsAnalyst combines source tables, reviewed cell mappings and deterministic calculation workbooks with a dossier and its faithfulness review. Reuse a saved workbook for another period only after reviewing source differences and changed mappings. Supported calculations and exported snapshots are narrower than a full Excel or automatic accounting workflow.
Explore AnalystConsultant develops the options, criteria and trade-offs inside a written recommendation. Formal Business Cases add staged review, case-local approval rules, financial scenarios, approved-revision memo checks and manually recorded actions and outcomes. Recorded inputs and approvals still need accountable people to check the evidence and assumptions.
Explore Consultant and Business CasesUse manual editing, selected-text Quick AI and Power Edit, and the shared proposal assistant currently labelled Ask Quill in the editor. Ask Gixo Business is the separate workflow planner. Preview, compare or restore saved body versions, then review the export. Comments and named sharing require Business Professional or higher and the current content role.
See editing, versions and exportBusiness packs coordinate briefs and recommendation memos with saved progress; eligible retries need a retained resume key. Optional proposals need Arc access. New standalone decision pages and frameworks belong to Prism, and decks belong to Lumen. Team and enterprise controls have their own plan and organization boundaries.
Review sources and product handoffsActual controls captured on 10 October 2026 with fictional, manually supplied material. These examples show planning, review and editing actions, plus deterministic calculations. Each caption states what was completed. Paid controls require current Business access and the appropriate content role.
Actual Ask Business plan and Brief route readiness. Two fictional TXT sources were supplied; no draft was queued.
The heuristic forecast is 70/100. Output checks still say Check after generation; this is not proof of a checked or completed report.
A separate focused-source plan shows the first two of nine review items, source locators and four blocking checks left. No review decision was submitted.
Consultant intake with three fictional options and four criteria. Working notes are assumptions; source import, case planning and recommendation generation were not submitted.
The filled Consultant intake still shows zero linked imports and no built case plan. Entering working notes does not make them imported evidence.
An actual fictional CSV is copied into the Analyst working table. Saved source-cell values are visible; imported Excel formulas are not executed.
The real projection shows planned_cost = 12000 and actual_cost = 13200 before applying the reviewed selections. Supplied figures are not independently verified.
Actual deterministic results: 13200 minus 12000 is 1200 USD adverse variance, or 10% of plan. The workbook was saved; no narrative dossier was generated.
New fictional values 12500/14000 and a changed heading appear beside saved values. The mapping checkbox was later confirmed; changes were not applied and no period review was accepted.
Real Draft policy controls with approval counts and reviewer-separation options. This policy preview was canceled; the case remains unapproved.
The fictional Base scenario uses 8000 initial investment, 500 monthly cost and 1500 monthly benefit. These are author assumptions, not measured savings.
Server-saved fictional Draft case: Base NPV 3495.77 USD, ROI 28.57%, payback 8 months. Expected NPV 2520.14 uses entered 25/50/25 probabilities. Approval and governed memo export were not completed.
The shared editor retains the Ask Quill label on Business-owned work. The instruction is entered; Suggest changes was not submitted and no AI proposal is shown.
Actual Power Edit dialog for an 85-character selection, with scope and reply-language controls. No instruction was submitted or replacement applied.
Actual v3-to-v4 visible-word comparison after one manual disclaimer edit. Restore was not used; this does not prove a full source, layout or case-state backup.
Actual shared editing console on the fictional Business-owned workbook, with its selected paragraph, floating tools and Writing Help rail. No AI proposal, formatting change or save was requested in this capture.
Actual Image Studio dialog showing image types, the selected-text subject and a prompt preview. Search, generation, upload and insertion were not submitted; no generated image or licensing outcome is demonstrated.
Follow the complete Business guide · Understand the source and approval boundaries
Updated
