Frame the decision
Name the audience, requested decision and source pack. Review imported tables and extracted text; record gaps instead of allowing a polished narrative to conceal them.
Turn a business question, source material, and constraints into a case plan, analytical working paper, and recommendation report. Consultant in Gixo Business keeps facts, assumptions, trade-offs, and recommendations separate so the output reads like advisory work, not generic AI prose.
Inspect an actual Business report. A readable decision brief needs the question, supplied evidence, options, assumptions and next decision—not just a shorter source document.
A decision, options compared on stated criteria, risks and a roadmap, every statement labelled Fact, Inference or Assumption.
Business question: Which actions should a small business that stores customer personal information take first to protect it and to be ready if it is exposed? Decision maker: The owner of a small business. Timeframe: The next quarter. Context: A small business collects customer personal information and keeps it in paper files and on computers. It has no dedicated security staff. Refer to it as 'the business' throughout and do not give it a name. Options: Take stock of the personal information it keeps and where it is stored; Reduce what it keeps to what the business needs; Lock down the information it keeps with practical safeguards; Prepare a plan for responding to a data breach. Criteria: How much personal information at risk it removes or protects; How realistic it is for a small team without security specialists; How well it limits the harm if information is exposed. Constraints: No dedicated security staff; Limited time and budget.
Open the full export and compare its statements with the cited sources before reuse.
Name the audience, requested decision and source pack. Review imported tables and extracted text; record gaps instead of allowing a polished narrative to conceal them.
Separate supplied facts, calculated values, assumptions and recommendations. For variance work, reconcile the period, unit, baseline and actual value before interpreting the direction of a difference.
Use options, trade-offs, risks and named next actions. Review the final artifact and, when using Analyst calculations, inspect the calculation evidence separately from the narrative.
Select source documents, case context, working notes, assumptions, options and decision constraints before generation. Inspect claims, metrics, exact quotations, source tables and conflicting figures. Review decisions are scoped to the source or artifact and can become stale after evidence changes; unresolved evidence should stay visible.
Keep investment, recurring costs, benefits, delays, growth, discount assumptions and scenario probabilities explicit. Inspect deterministic cash flow and the available return, payback and sensitivity outputs. Compare scenarios before selection, and inspect the formula workbook or calculation receipt separately from the narrative recommendation.
Inspect the dossier's source tables, working rows and columns, calculation ledger and workbook handoff. Metric packs retain reviewable calculation and source context. Preview source replacements for a new period before accepting them. Execution records distinguish an action owner, baseline, target, measured value, data source and the reason for a status change.
A calculation can be replayable while the supplied inputs remain wrong. A generated report is decision support, not independent diligence, audit assurance or investment advice.
This is not a single-pass document generator. The workflow frames the case first, compiles the analytical layer, then produces the report from that working paper.
Define the decision-maker, timing, options, constraints, and missing inputs before generation starts. Ambiguity becomes a visible part of the process, not a hidden assumption.
Compile evidence, criteria, trade-offs, and scenario logic into a structured working layer that the final report can inherit without collapsing into marketing language.
Generate a consultant-style report with executive framing, options analysis, confidence, risks, and explicit next steps tied back to the case logic.
The strongest fit is any situation where the output needs a point of view, a defendable reasoning chain, and a clean executive deliverable.
Market entry, portfolio prioritization, build-vs-buy, operating model redesign, and expansion planning where decision quality matters more than word count.
Corporate strategy, finance, PMO, and transformation teams that need recommendation reports without running every decision through a long manual memo cycle.
Boutique and solo consultancies that want a faster way to produce case framing, working papers, and executive-ready reports from recurring source material.
Start with the business question, the decision to be made, the audience, known options, timing, and constraints.
Add documents, notes, research, or internal context so the working paper is grounded in actual evidence and not a generic prior.
Missing criteria, weak evidence, and unclear alternatives appear as explicit follow-up questions instead of being silently papered over.
Produce a report while keeping the recommendation, decision logic, and framework work connected to the same business case.
Updated