Best for
Your team needs a legal-work lifecycle: structured intake, Draft Checks, versioned playbooks, Agreement Packs, negotiation records, simple electronic signature, and obligation follow-up, with professional review before action.
Prepare legal documents from structured intake and reference material. Inspect Draft Checks, revise clauses, compare versions and carry the work into an Agreement Pack for qualified review.
Explore the review workflow and compare current access options. Compare plans
Follow a fictional confidentiality clause through review, revise its duration and inspect the tracked changes in the Word export.
Recorded in the product using fictional inputs. Follow the input, the review step and the exported result.
Watch on YouTube ↗Loading the video player…
Inspect current clause editing, Ask Lex instructions and saved-version comparisons, with dated screenshots from a fictional NDA.
Built for in-house legal, legal ops, finance, audit, and compliance teams that need reviewable work product rather than generic AI answers.
Beyond drafting from structured intake, Lex can start from a contract you already hold, keep a matter's sources and findings together, help with one clause at a time, and record every applied clause edit. Each still ends in qualified review.
Compare contract versions. Use Compare to inspect saved revisions. With Lex review access, Review mode keeps the document read-only while you inspect findings and record decisions; it does not certify legal correctness.
Review clause edits before applying them. A manual edit or staged Ask Lex proposal shows the before and after wording. Replacement normally keeps subsections unless you include them; removal and changed numerical terms need acknowledgement. Validate the proposed text again after changing it, then decide whether to Apply to the saved version it was previewed against.
Approve the version you reviewed. The contract approval workflow ties the approval receipt to the exact saved version. With no approvers named, one approver's receipt records the decision; approvers can also be named in order, with two rules that add an approver for high-risk findings or for a liability cap above an amount you set, and then the drafter cannot approve, the next approver is notified in Gixo and by email, and the receipt records the whole chain. Resolve findings and open items before approval; later text or source changes require fresh review. This is a reviewer decision, not a legal verdict.
Decide the AI review findings. Every contract in Lex, drafted or imported, gets an AI contract review that reports expected clauses as present, weak or absent, risks with the party they fall on and replacement wording, and provisions that cannot both be followed, with every quotation checked against the contract text. Each finding is decided before approval; an edit leaves the review as the review of the earlier version until you review the changes.
Keep saved obligations current as source documents change, and review upcoming dates before preparing a new-period worklist. Explore obligation and calendar review.
Gixo helps prepare regulated work. It does not provide legal advice, certify compliance, or replace professional review.
Guides, tutorials, FAQ, pricing context, and competitor comparisons for Legal & Compliance.
Cited sources can show which sentences of a draft are supported by the reference files you supplied. The AI contract review separately returns findings whose quotations are checked against the contract text. Neither proves that a source is correct or that the wording complies with the governing law.
Review a current contract finding, its quotation and the requested decision before approval. For related documents, the review table keeps quoted results and your questions together. A new draft or changed text needs its own review; a prior clean result is not an approval of later wording.
Matter findings can retain exact source-version and passage links. Draft Cited sources remains an in-app review aid and is not inserted into the contract or its exports. Governing-law research and an imported contract’s Word-format fidelity have separate availability and limits. Counsel still decides what can be relied on, approved and signed.
See current Lex review workflows Read the complete Lex guide
A worked workflow
The captured run comes first and is a separate fictional NDA. The brief and steps after it are their own example: a fictional confidentiality draft says “twelve months”; the supplied reviewer instruction requests “twenty-four months”. The task is to inspect and apply that bounded change while keeping the source, draft version and export path clear.
A separate run from the brief further down this section: a supplied fictional NDA was imported as version 1. Its confidentiality clause changed from two years to three, employees changed to personnel, and a five-business-day compelled-disclosure notice was added. Structural validation ran before the change was applied and saved as version 2. The actual redline contains three native Word insertions and two deletions.
The parties and instructions are fictional. The three-year period is the instruction in this run, not a position a playbook permits. Structural validation is not legal approval: five high-risk review items remained unresolved, including an intentionally broken Section 9.9 reference. Approval and signing were not completed. This capture does not establish a confirmed obligation or the legal suitability of the example terms.
Open the imported document or saved draft and locate the clause to review.
Inspect: Keep its source identity and version. A matching phrase alone does not prove that a proposal targets the intended clause.
Use Ask Lex or the supported clause-editing path and inspect before/after text, checks and any required override or reviewer decision.
Inspect: The proposed wording must be visible before application. Do not treat a model suggestion as the matter’s approved legal position.
Apply only through the permitted versioned workflow and inspect the saved result.
Inspect: If the draft has changed, resolve the version difference. An old proposal should not silently overwrite later work.
Open the actual exported DOCX and inspect insertions, deletions, comments and surrounding structure.
Inspect: The downloadable sample demonstrates a saved-version redline from supplied HTML. It does not prove preservation of arbitrary incoming Word layouts or unsupported edits.
Fictional supplied wording and reviewer instruction, not a legal recommendation about duration. The sample export demonstrates the identified redline path only.
Your team needs a legal-work lifecycle: structured intake, Draft Checks, versioned playbooks, Agreement Packs, negotiation records, simple electronic signature, and obligation follow-up, with professional review before action.
You need legal advice, independent certification, qualified or certificate-based signing, ongoing control surveillance, or a document that can be executed without qualified review.
Reference files and governing context can shape the draft. Cited sources can show which draft sentences are supported by supplied reference files. This in-app support does not establish legal authority or statutory compliance and is not inserted into the contract or its exports; reviewers still check the facts and law independently.
Qualified reviewers must verify authority, jurisdiction, facts, clause choices, defined terms, cross-references, obligations, and execution readiness.
Supplied-file citations are an in-app review aid, stay out of contract exports and do not establish legal authority or replace counsel.
Start with the limited $29/seat/month Solo Pilot. The $99/seat/month Solo plan is the professional default; higher tiers add firm collaboration, team operations, governance, and procurement support.
Limited single-seat pilot for evaluating the core Lex workflow
Limited single-seat evaluation of Lex
Guided intake, drafting, and deterministic Draft Checks
Personal workspace and clean export
Pilot terms may change
Professional solo workflow from structured intake through review and execution handoff
Professional solo legal workflow
Draft Checks, review playbooks, and issue decisions
Agreement Packs, negotiation positions, and obligations
Word/DOCX handoff and approved precedent comparison
Simple e-signature, approval and execution records
Three-seat practice for collaborative document review and negotiation
Everything in Solo
Internal sharing, comments, and assignments
Collaborative review and negotiation across the firm
Minimum 3 seats
Five-seat legal operations workspace for agreements and compliance work
Everything in Small Firm
Shared workspaces and team management
Minimum 5 seats
Ten-seat governed deployment through marketplace or private offer
Everything in Growing Firm
Azure marketplace or private offer
API access, plus a report of the AI providers and models that handle your work
Onboarding and enterprise rollout support
Minimum 10 seats
Solo and higher Lex plans include guided intake, multi-party support, reference-file upload, deterministic Draft Checks, review playbooks, Agreement Packs, negotiation and obligation workflows, approval and execution records, and export. The support-routed Solo Pilot is the limited evaluation its card describes. Collaboration, team administration, and API access vary by plan; version history is on every plan. Agreement Packs include simple electronic signature, which is not a qualified or certificate-based signature. Gixo helps prepare work for qualified review; it does not give legal advice or certify compliance.
Updated