Make the intake specific
Supply the parties, document kind, jurisdiction, obligations, dates and reference material. Review imported content and retain its source identity before using it in a new matter.
Prepare policy and SOP drafts your reviewers can finish
Prepare compliance drafts designed to surface missing facts as review items. Reviewers still verify every fact and conclusion before action. Use Gixo when your team still has to review the wording, check the evidence, and decide what is ready for implementation.
Lex · real output
Read the matter facts and the resulting draft together.
This is a real Lex export for invented parties. Inspect the input and clauses as a worked example, with professional review kept separate from automated drafting and checks.
Mutual Non-Disclosure Agreement (worked example)
A mutual non-disclosure agreement of 14 numbered clauses between two invented parties: definitions, what counts as confidential information, exclusions, the receiving party's obligations, permitted disclosures, return of materials, remedies, term, survival, governing law, notices and signature blocks. Its first page says it is a worked example, not a legal document.
Inspect the source brief or data
Draft a Mutual Non-Disclosure Agreement between Larkfield Analytics Ltd (Party A) and Fenwick & Dale Stores Ltd (Party B). Governing law: England and Wales. Effective date: 2027-01-15. Term: Two years from the effective date. Confidentiality: Three years after disclosure. A mutual agreement: each party may disclose and receive confidential information. State on the first page that the parties, people and addresses in this agreement are invented and that it is a worked example, not a legal document. The notice email address of Larkfield Analytics Ltd is notices@larkfield-analytics.example and of Fenwick & Dale Stores Ltd is notices@fenwick-dale.example (both invented).
Read the sample review notes
Read mechanically against the intake, not by a lawyer: all 12 facts the intake gave are in the draft, nothing is left as a placeholder, and it states no term the intake did not give.
Inspect clauses and changes
Use the legal workspace's permitted structural tools, Draft Checks and review paths. Compare proposed changes with the saved draft and original material; unsupported Word edits must be handled explicitly.
Approve the exact version
Have qualified counsel review enforceability, local requirements and the actual commercial intent. Check the current approval state and the downloaded document after a change.
Structured clause proposals and permitted changes
Select the target clause and give Ask Lex a bounded instruction. Missing facts remain visible for review. Inspect the before-and-after proposal, required clause checks and any explicit outside-matrix or mandatory-clause override before versioned application. Use the legal workspace's structural allowlist rather than assuming every general content-editor block is available.
Playbooks, source evidence and obligations
Inspect immutable playbook versions, anchored findings, provenance and precedent variants before staging a change. Matters retain original sources, quotation findings and source-version comparisons. Review extracted obligations for timing, ownership and source revision; negotiation turns and agreement-pack review cells have their own decisions and current-version requirements.
Original Word, redlines and the delivery receipt
Original-format Word export, tracked changes against an original and saved-version redlines are separate paths. Unsupported edits must be surfaced rather than silently claimed as preserved. Inspect the layout, validator notes and downloaded file, then retain its delivery receipt. Counsel's review applies to the actual matter and version.
AI contract review, key terms and review of every document
Every contract in Lex, drafted or imported, gets an AI contract review: each clause the document type expects marked present, weak or absent; up to 25 risks with a level, the party each falls on, why it matters and replacement wording; and provisions that cannot both be followed. Every quotation is checked against the contract text, findings are decided before approval, and there is no single risk score. The same review reads the key terms and obligations with the words they quote and proposes them into the Agreement Pack. Review every document puts up to 25 documents of an Agreement Pack, or up to 200 in a matter, into one table with your own questions as columns and an Excel export. Approvers can be named in order, and signing supports up to 10 signers with an optional signing order and automatic reminders; it is a simple electronic signature, not a qualified one. A qualified reviewer still decides what the contract says.
Lex does not provide legal advice or certify compliance. The public specimen is not a universally reusable legal template. Word fidelity depends on the supported original-document and saved-version path; unrestricted Power Edit and image insertion are not legal editing features.
An AI policy generator turns your company context and reference files into a structured first-draft policy or SOP — purpose, scope, responsibilities, exceptions, and review notes — instead of a blank template. Gixo prepares reviewable policy and SOP drafts that keep placeholders where facts are missing, so compliance, legal, or operations reviewers finish the wording, check the evidence, and decide what is ready to implement.
Last updated: July 2026
What is an AI policy generator?
Reference files and governing context can shape the draft. Cited sources can show which draft sentences are supported by supplied reference files. This in-app support does not establish legal authority or statutory compliance and is not inserted into the contract or its exports; reviewers still check the facts and law independently.
Policy draft structure
Start with purpose, scope, responsibilities, exceptions, and review notes so the reviewer gets a coherent draft instead of a blank template.
Wording shaped by the frameworks you name
Use relevant frameworks and source material to shape the draft while keeping open items visible wherever the facts are incomplete. The draft follows that framing — from the model's understanding of each framework, not a built-in framework catalog.
SOP and procedure drafts
Prepare companion procedure drafts and operating notes that reviewers can refine into final internal documents.
Visible open items
The workflow is designed to surface missing control owners, cadences, and operational details for reviewer confirmation.
Reviewer handoff inside the workspace
After the first draft, Lex runs an AI contract review of the whole contract, with every quotation checked against the text, beside rule checks: clause coverage against a versioned playbook, clause-conflict detection, and defined-term and cross-reference checks. Findings, tracked-change DOCX redlines, comments, review state, assignees, due dates, and version history all stay attached to the same document. A contract imported from Word can go back as that same DOCX, with the Lex edits shown as Word tracked changes; where Lex cannot track an edit faithfully, such as inside a field, an existing revision, a header or a footer, it refuses the export instead of altering the document. Reviewers still verify every clause and conclusion.
Clear boundary on what Gixo does
Gixo helps prepare regulated work. It does not provide legal advice, certify compliance, or replace professional review.
How do you create a policy with AI in 4 steps?
1
Choose the policy or procedure job
Start with the policy topic, procedure set, or compliance artifact the team needs to draft and gather the source pack that should shape it.
2
Bring in existing references
Upload prior policies, SOPs, controls documentation, or framework notes so your existing material can inform the next draft.
3
Generate a reviewable draft
Gixo prepares the draft structure and is designed to surface gaps where facts are still missing. Reviewers verify approval chains and operational detail.
4
Review, refine, and export
Use the workspace review layer and export the document once compliance, legal, or operations reviewers are satisfied.
What policy documents can an AI policy generator produce?
Gixo prepares reviewable drafts and keeps the honest boundary visible: it structures the work and flags open items, but it does not certify compliance or replace professional review.
| Question | Gixo AI Policy Generator |
|---|---|
| What it produces | Reviewable policy drafts, SOP drafts, checklists, evidence matrices, working papers, filing-support notes |
| Policy/SOP types | HR & workplace conduct, remote work, data protection, cybersecurity, acceptable-use / generative-AI-use, plus custom |
| How facts are handled | Designed to surface placeholders where owners, cadence, or operational detail are unknown; reviewers verify the result |
| Source verification | Reference files can shape the policy draft; qualified reviewers still check each fact and governing authority. Supplied-file support does not establish legal authority or policy compliance |
| Framework mapping | Drafts follow the frameworks or statutory requirements you name and the source material you supply; clause-by-clause framework models today cover GDPR Article 30 records of processing, GDPR Article 30(2) processor records of processing, GDPR Article 35 data protection impact assessment, GDPR Articles 33 and 34 breach procedure and register, CCPA and CPRA notice at collection, HIPAA Notice of Privacy Practices, HIPAA Security Rule risk analysis |
| Review handoff | Comments, review state, assignees, due dates, and versions stay attached to the same document; each export is written to an audit log (who exported it, the format, and whether it succeeded) rather than stored with the document |
| Export formats | PDF, DOCX, HTML, and TXT |
| What it is NOT | Not legal advice, not a compliance certification, not a policy-distribution/lifecycle system, not a replacement for professional review |
Is an AI-generated policy legally compliant?
Gixo helps prepare regulated work. It does not provide legal advice, certify compliance, or replace professional review.
How does Gixo compare to policy management systems?
The job is not to ask AI for a legal answer. The job is to prepare a draft or artifact that a qualified reviewer can actually work with.
| Capability | Gixo | Policy management systems | Manual drafting |
|---|---|---|---|
| Main job | Draft preparation workspace | Distribution and lifecycle management | Manual authoring |
| Policy and SOP first drafts | Yes | Template dependent | Manual |
| Visible open-item placeholders | Included for review | Ask the vendor | Manual |
| Operational rollout and reminders | Not included | Often included | No |
| Reviewer handoff | Yes | Usually included | Manual |
The other columns describe what each kind of tool is generally for, not a test of a named product, and products differ. Run the same brief and reference files through anything on your shortlist, then compare the draft, the review trail and the export.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is an AI policy generator?
An AI policy generator turns your company context and reference files into a structured first-draft policy or SOP — purpose, scope, responsibilities, exceptions, and review notes — instead of a blank template. Gixo prepares reviewable drafts that keep placeholders where facts are missing, so compliance, legal, or operations reviewers finish the wording, check the evidence, and decide what is ready to implement.
What types of policies and SOPs can I draft?
Common types include HR and workplace conduct, remote work, data protection, cybersecurity, and acceptable-use or generative-AI-use policies, plus custom drafts. Gixo can also prepare companion SOP drafts and related compliance artifacts alongside the main policy.
What can this policy generator prepare?
Policy drafts, SOP drafts, compliance artifacts with visible open items, and related narrative documents that still need reviewer judgment before rollout.
Does Gixo manage approvals and reminder workflows?
No. Gixo prepares the draft and keeps review on the document. Full operational policy management remains a separate system.
Can I map drafts to frameworks or statutory requirements?
Yes, as drafting work. The draft follows the frameworks or statutory requirements you name and the source material you supply. Clause-by-clause framework models today cover GDPR Article 30 records of processing, GDPR Article 30(2) processor records of processing, GDPR Article 35 data protection impact assessment, GDPR Articles 33 and 34 breach procedure and register, CCPA and CPRA notice at collection, HIPAA Notice of Privacy Practices, HIPAA Security Rule risk analysis; for any other framework the mapping comes from the model's understanding of it, not a built-in catalog. The system helps prepare the artifact, not certify the final outcome.
Can I generate linked procedures or SOPs?
Yes. Teams can prepare supporting procedure drafts and refine them alongside the main policy document.
Does Gixo provide compliance advice?
Gixo helps prepare regulated work. It does not provide legal advice, certify compliance, or replace professional review.
Gixo Legal & Compliance
Compliance Checklists
Evidence Matrices
Risk Registers
Information Security Policy Generator
Pricing
Updated
More from Gixo