Make the intake specific
Supply the parties, document kind, jurisdiction, obligations, dates and reference material. Review imported content and retain its source identity before using it in a new matter.
AI risk register generator for reviewable drafts
Gixo helps teams draft structured risk registers with categories, scoring fields, mitigation notes, and evidence placeholders. It prepares the artifact layer for governance review, not a full risk-operations platform.
An AI risk register is a structured document that lists identified risks with their category, impact and likelihood scores, mitigation notes, and evidence placeholders so a governance or audit reviewer can work through them row by row. Gixo generates a draft register in this structure — with scoring fields for impact, likelihood, inherent risk, and residual risk, plus mitigation notes and evidence gaps left visible — then exports it as a reviewer-ready artifact. It is not a live risk-workflow platform: owner routing, escalation, and ongoing dashboards remain a separate system decision.
Lex · real output
Read the matter facts and the resulting draft together.
This is a real Lex export for invented parties. Inspect the input and clauses as a worked example, with professional review kept separate from automated drafting and checks.
Mutual Non-Disclosure Agreement (worked example)
A mutual non-disclosure agreement of 14 numbered clauses between two invented parties: definitions, what counts as confidential information, exclusions, the receiving party's obligations, permitted disclosures, return of materials, remedies, term, survival, governing law, notices and signature blocks. Its first page says it is a worked example, not a legal document.
Inspect the source brief or data
Draft a Mutual Non-Disclosure Agreement between Larkfield Analytics Ltd (Party A) and Fenwick & Dale Stores Ltd (Party B). Governing law: England and Wales. Effective date: 2027-01-15. Term: Two years from the effective date. Confidentiality: Three years after disclosure. A mutual agreement: each party may disclose and receive confidential information. State on the first page that the parties, people and addresses in this agreement are invented and that it is a worked example, not a legal document. The notice email address of Larkfield Analytics Ltd is notices@larkfield-analytics.example and of Fenwick & Dale Stores Ltd is notices@fenwick-dale.example (both invented).
Read the sample review notes
Read mechanically against the intake, not by a lawyer: all 12 facts the intake gave are in the draft, nothing is left as a placeholder, and it states no term the intake did not give.
Inspect clauses and changes
Use the legal workspace's permitted structural tools, Draft Checks and review paths. Compare proposed changes with the saved draft and original material; unsupported Word edits must be handled explicitly.
Approve the exact version
Have qualified counsel review enforceability, local requirements and the actual commercial intent. Check the current approval state and the downloaded document after a change.
Structured clause proposals and permitted changes
Select the target clause and give Ask Lex a bounded instruction. Missing facts remain visible for review. Inspect the before-and-after proposal, required clause checks and any explicit outside-matrix or mandatory-clause override before versioned application. Use the legal workspace's structural allowlist rather than assuming every general content-editor block is available.
Playbooks, source evidence and obligations
Inspect immutable playbook versions, anchored findings, provenance and precedent variants before staging a change. Matters retain original sources, quotation findings and source-version comparisons. Review extracted obligations for timing, ownership and source revision; negotiation turns and agreement-pack review cells have their own decisions and current-version requirements.
Original Word, redlines and the delivery receipt
Original-format Word export, tracked changes against an original and saved-version redlines are separate paths. Unsupported edits must be surfaced rather than silently claimed as preserved. Inspect the layout, validator notes and downloaded file, then retain its delivery receipt. Counsel's review applies to the actual matter and version.
AI contract review, key terms and review of every document
Every contract in Lex, drafted or imported, gets an AI contract review: each clause the document type expects marked present, weak or absent; up to 25 risks with a level, the party each falls on, why it matters and replacement wording; and provisions that cannot both be followed. Every quotation is checked against the contract text, findings are decided before approval, and there is no single risk score. The same review reads the key terms and obligations with the words they quote and proposes them into the Agreement Pack. Review every document puts up to 25 documents of an Agreement Pack, or up to 200 in a matter, into one table with your own questions as columns and an Excel export. Approvers can be named in order, and signing supports up to 10 signers with an optional signing order and automatic reminders; it is a simple electronic signature, not a qualified one. A qualified reviewer still decides what the contract says.
Lex does not provide legal advice or certify compliance. The public specimen is not a universally reusable legal template. Word fidelity depends on the supported original-document and saved-version path; unrestricted Power Edit and image insertion are not legal editing features.
What is a risk register, and what does an AI risk register include?
Prepare compliance drafts designed to surface missing facts as review items. Reviewers still verify every fact and conclusion before action.
Risk Identification
Draft entries across operational, financial, strategic, regulatory, cybersecurity, or custom categories based on the context your team provides.
Scoring Fields
Capture impact, likelihood, inherent risk, residual risk, and qualitative notes in a consistent structure reviewers can refine.
Mitigation Notes
Add planned controls, mitigation text, and open questions without implying the system is monitoring remediation in real time.
Responsibility Context
Note the responsible team or reviewer inside the artifact itself. Gixo is not a dedicated ownership, routing, or escalation platform.
Review Notes
Capture next-review guidance and open items in the document so governance reviewers know what still needs attention.
Reviewer-Ready Export
Export the register as a structured artifact for board, audit, or management review rather than a live dashboard.
What fields does a Gixo AI risk register draft include?
| Register Element | What It Captures | Included in Gixo Draft |
|---|---|---|
| Risk Identification | Operational, financial, strategic, regulatory, cybersecurity, or custom categories based on team-provided context | Yes |
| Scoring Fields | Impact, likelihood, inherent risk, residual risk, and qualitative notes | Yes |
| Mitigation Notes | Planned controls, mitigation text, and open questions | Yes |
| Responsibility Context | Responsible team or reviewer noted inside the artifact | Yes (context only, not routing/escalation) |
| Review Notes | Next-review guidance and open items for governance follow-up | Yes |
| Export Format | Structured artifact for board, audit, or management review | PDF, DOCX, HTML, and TXT |
How do you generate an AI risk register with Gixo?
1
Describe the scope and taxonomy
Start with the business unit, initiative, or control domain you want to review, then pick the risk categories that matter for that context.
2
Generate structured register entries
Gixo prepares draft rows with descriptions, categories, scoring fields, mitigation notes, and room for evidence or reviewer comments.
3
Refine scores and mark missing support
Adjust impact, likelihood, and mitigation details while leaving uncertain facts or missing evidence visible to the reviewing team.
4
Export for governance review
Export the register when it is ready for board, audit, or management review. Ongoing workflow management remains a separate system decision.
How does Gixo compare to LogicGate, Resolver, and spreadsheets?
The job is not to ask AI for a legal answer. The job is to prepare a draft or artifact that a qualified reviewer can actually work with.
| Capability | Gixo | LogicGate | Resolver | Spreadsheets |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Main job | Artifact drafting | Risk workflow platform | Risk workflow platform | Manual tracking |
| Initial register structure | Generated from context | Configured workflow | Configured workflow | Manual |
| Scoring fields | Built into draft | Yes | Yes | Manual formulas |
| Missing-info handling | Leaves gaps visible | Ask the vendor | Ask the vendor | Manual |
| Owner routing and escalation | Not included | Yes | Yes | Manual |
| Reviewer-ready export | Structured | Reports | Reports | Print or export |
The other columns describe what each kind of tool is generally for, not a test of a named product, and products differ. Run the same brief and reference files through anything on your shortlist, then compare the draft, the review trail and the export.
Frequently Asked Questions
How does risk scoring work?
Use the scoring model your team already follows, or start from a simple impact and likelihood structure that reviewers can adjust after the draft is generated.
Can I customize risk categories?
Yes. Start from standard categories or define custom ones that match your organization’s taxonomy.
Can the draft include residual-risk notes?
Yes. You can capture inherent and residual risk thinking in the register draft, along with mitigation notes and open questions.
Is this a substitute for a dedicated risk platform?
No. Gixo prepares the document artifact. Dedicated risk platforms still handle workflow routing, dashboards, and ongoing ownership processes.
How is this different from a risk assessment brief?
A risk assessment brief is a narrative analysis. A risk register is a structured artifact your team can review, edit, and export in table form.
What export formats are available?
Export as PDF, DOCX, HTML, and TXT so the register remains usable outside the workspace.
What is an AI risk register?
A risk register is a structured artifact that lists risks by category (operational, financial, strategic, regulatory, cybersecurity, or custom) alongside impact and likelihood scores, inherent and residual risk, mitigation notes, and evidence placeholders, so a reviewer can work through it in table form rather than reading a narrative. Gixo drafts this structure from the context you provide and is designed to surface missing evidence or uncertain facts for review. Reviewers verify the result; Gixo does not replace a dedicated risk-workflow platform for ownership routing or escalation.
What risk categories does the register cover?
Draft entries can span operational, financial, strategic, regulatory, cybersecurity, or custom categories based on the context your team provides, with standard categories available to start from or fully custom taxonomies you define.
Gixo Legal & Compliance
Compliance Documentation Software
Compliance Checklists
AI Policy Generator
Audit Working Papers
Risk Assessment Brief
Compliance Workspace
Risk Register Software
Pricing
Official scope checked 10 October 2026: LogicGate describes risk-intake/assessment agents, linked mitigation records, workflows and reports; Resolver describes integrated risk and control assessments, action and analytics. These are broader operational systems, and their current AI/document capabilities should be tested rather than assumed absent. Lex prepares a register draft for qualified review; it does not operate that ongoing risk system.
Updated
More from Gixo