

Sales proposal · 12-page PDF · 2,932 words
Sales proposal: weekly shop dashboards, Fenwick & Dale Stores
A proposal for an invented regional retailer: the buyer's own untested estimate of what stock-outs cost it (described as untested), what the supplier will deliver and own, the data connections and implementation approach, the launch timeline, a first-year price built from the bidder's rates, two case studies and the team.
The brief and the inputs Arc was given
Propose weekly shop dashboards and a head-office comparison view to Fenwick & Dale Stores on behalf of Larkfield Analytics Ltd, with the supplier owning the data connections to the till, stock and loyalty systems. In any requirements table list only what the buyer's brief asks for; Larkfield's own standards belong in the method. Build every price line from the standard rates in the evidence file and show the days or months behind it. Add nothing the evidence file does not state. Put a notice on the cover page that the buyer and the bidder are fictional and the proposal is a worked example. Inputs: the buyer's document (brief-fenwick-dale.md); the bidder's evidence file (larkfield-evidence.md); commercial terms: value 52,000 to 60,000 GBP, valid for 60 days, payment terms 'Invoiced monthly in arrears, payable within 30 days.'; deal context: The buyer and the bidder in this proposal are fictional, and this proposal is a worked example. The buyer's out-of-stock cost of 5 to 7 percent of weekly sales in its three busiest shops is the buyer's own untested estimate and must be described as such. The first dashboards must be in shop managers' hands within 14 weeks.
A separate reviewer agent read its 178 claims against the bidder's evidence file, the buyer's brief and the deal terms: 142 are supported, 36 add detail or an inference, none is absent from every input and none contradicts one. Every price line recomputes. It is not a person's review.


