Lumen built each deck on 4 October 2026 from the public U.S. government document or documents named on its card, with web research switched off and a request to use only those sources. The review findings on each card identify supported claims and claims needing correction or further evidence. Each deck exports as an HTML player, a PowerPoint file and a PDF, and the files below are exactly those exports; only the player's photographs are re-encoded to WebP so the pages that embed it stay light. No company is named or described in any of them, so none carries company figures: a fundraising deck leaves out the product, traction and ask slides because the documents do not supply them, and Lumen was told not to invent them.
Board update deck · 10 slides · 10-page PDF
Governing Cybersecurity Risk: An Executive Briefing on NIST CSF 2.0
A 10-slide briefing for an organisation’s leaders on NIST’s Cybersecurity Framework 2.0, built only from the framework document: the six Functions as a set with Govern at the centre, what Govern covers, questions leaders can ask their teams, how Current and Target Profiles show the gap to close, and the four Tiers. It describes no company, so it has no performance data.
The request and the documents Lumen was given
A briefing for the executive leadership of an organisation of any kind; no company is named and none is described. Cover, in this order: what the framework is and why leaders should care; the six Functions, shown together as a set with Govern at the centre, with no numbering or order because the document says they are addressed concurrently; what the Govern Function covers, using the document's own list of Govern topics; questions leaders can ask their teams, in the document's own terms; what Current and Target Profiles are and how comparing them shows the gap to close; the four Tiers by name; and what to ask for next. Do not show any process as numbered steps. Say executives, leaders or the organisation wherever the document does: it mentions boards of directors only as readers, so do not give a board any role the document does not give it. Give at most one slide to how different kinds of organisation use the framework. Use only the supplied document. Where it gives no figure, date or finding, do not supply one: use no placeholders, no illustrative numbers and no made-up status data. Pictures should show technology, infrastructure or abstract subjects, not people. Workflow: Corporate executive. 10 slides requested. Document supplied as text (NIST, "The NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0, NIST CSWP 29 (26 February 2024)", https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/CSWP/NIST.CSWP.29.pdf).
HTML player (1.1 MB)PowerPoint (3.3 MB)PDF (1.6 MB)
A separate reviewer agent read the deck’s 70 claims, slides and speaker notes, against the framework document: 62 are supported, 8 loosen or go a little beyond its wording, and none is missing from it or contradicts it. 19 of the 70 are advice the deck gives, and all 19 are supported. It is not a person’s review.
Fundraising deck · 12 slides · 12-page PDF
Investor Brief: Why Grid Battery Storage Is Growing
A 12-slide investor brief on grid battery storage, built only from two public EIA articles: how much capacity the U.S. has and how fast it grew, what is planned for 2026 to 2028, and how storage earns revenue. It has no product, traction or ask slides, because the articles supply none and Lumen did not invent them.
The request and the documents Lumen was given
An investor narrative for a company that is raising money; no company is named and nothing is known about it. Build the market context and the case for why now from the supplied pages only: how large and how fast utility-scale battery storage has grown, what is planned next, what the largest facilities are, and how storage earns revenue, as the pages describe it. The company's product, traction, financials, team and the amount it is raising are not supplied, so leave those slides out: do not invent them, and use no placeholders and no illustrative numbers. Every figure must come from the supplied pages. Workflow: Startup fundraising. 12 slides requested. Documents supplied as text (EIA, "U.S. battery capacity increased 66% in 2024 (Today in Energy, 12 March 2025)", https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=64705; EIA, "Battery storage capacity averaged 70% growth over the last three years (Today in Energy)", https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=67925).
HTML player (2.3 MB)PowerPoint (8.3 MB)PDF (3.2 MB)
A separate reviewer agent read the deck’s 86 claims, slides and speaker notes, against the two EIA articles: 69 are supported, 11 loosen or go a little beyond their wording, 6 are in neither article and none contradicts one. Three of the six are the deck’s opinions or advice about the opportunity; the other three say how big storage is on the grid or how fast it is growing in comparison, which the articles do not say. It is not a person’s review.
Buyer narrative deck · 12 slides · 12-page PDF
Customer Data Security: A Buyer Conversation Built on FTC Guidance
A 12-slide buyer conversation about protecting customer data, built only from two FTC guides: why customer information is worth protecting, the guides’ five principles and ten lessons, and practical first steps. It describes no provider and no product, so its proof is the FTC’s own guidance.
The request and the documents Lumen was given
A client-facing deck for a conversation between a security services provider and the owner of a small business that holds customer information. Open on the owner's situation, then the proof, then the next step. The proof is what the supplied FTC guides say; do not describe, praise or price any provider, product, customer or result, and name no company. Every statement must come from the supplied guides; where they give no figure or finding, do not supply one and use no placeholders. Workflow: Sales and marketing. 12 slides requested. Documents supplied as text (FTC, "Start with Security: A Guide for Business (FTC)", https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/plain-language/pdf0205-startwithsecurity.pdf; FTC, "Protecting Personal Information: A Guide for Business (FTC)", https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/plain-language/pdf-0136_proteting-personal-information.pdf).
HTML player (770 KB)PowerPoint (2.9 MB)PDF (1.3 MB)
A separate reviewer agent read the deck’s 78 claims, slides and speaker notes, against the two FTC guides: 73 are supported, 5 loosen or go a little beyond the guides’ wording, and none is missing from them or contradicts them. 37 of the 78 are advice the deck gives, and 36 of those are supported. It is not a person’s review.
Client strategy deck · 12 slides · 12-page PDF
Grid-Scale Battery Storage: Where the 2026 Buildout Is Concentrated
A 12-slide client strategy deck on where planned U.S. solar and battery storage additions concentrate in 2026, built only from two EIA articles: the national buildout, the leading states for solar and for storage, the named projects, and a recommended order of attention. It reaches its answer at the end.
The request and the documents Lumen was given
A consulting-style handoff for the leadership team of an electricity business that is deciding where to look first as new solar and battery storage capacity is built; no client is named and none is described. Frame the situation, the analysis the supplied pages support, a recommendation and an action plan. Every figure must come from the supplied pages. The client's own numbers are not known, so recommend in terms of what the pages show, and use no placeholders and no made-up client metrics. Workflow: Consulting and strategy. 12 slides requested. Documents supplied as text (EIA, "Solar, battery storage to lead new U.S. generating capacity additions in 2025 (Today in Energy)", https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=64586; EIA, "New U.S. electric generating capacity expected to reach a record high in 2026 (Today in Energy)", https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=67205).
HTML player (1.7 MB)PowerPoint (4.7 MB)PDF (2.3 MB)
A separate reviewer agent read the deck’s 74 claims, slides and speaker notes, against the two EIA articles: 53 are supported, 5 loosen or go a little beyond their wording, 16 are in neither article and none contradicts one. All 16 are advice or a judgement about which market to take first, such as “Start the solar market scan in Texas.” It is not a person’s review.
Long explanatory deck · 14 slides · 14-page PDF
Electricity in the United States: Generation, Capacity and Sales
A 14-slide explainer on how U.S. electricity is generated, delivered and sold, built only from two EIA pages: the 2025 generation mix, what each generating technology does, installed capacity and how it serves base, intermediate and peak demand, and retail sales by customer type. Its three charts use the pages’ own figures.
The request and the documents Lumen was given
A long explanatory deck for a general business audience on how electricity is generated, how generating capacity differs from generation, and how it is sold in the United States. Cover the three subjects in balance: generation by source, capacity and how the grid is run, and retail sales by customer sector and by type of seller. Use only the supplied pages; every figure, date and definition must come from them, and where they give none do not supply one. Use charts only for figures the pages give. Put the minor sources of generation together on one slide, and give every item of the agenda at least one slide of its own. Workflow: General business. 14 slides requested. Documents supplied as text (EIA, "Electricity in the United States (Energy Explained)", https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/electricity/electricity-in-the-us.php; EIA, "Electricity in the United States: generation, capacity, and sales (Energy Explained)", https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/electricity/electricity-in-the-us-generation-capacity-and-sales.php).
HTML player (1.6 MB)PowerPoint (5.2 MB)PDF (3 MB)
A separate reviewer agent read the deck’s 107 claims, slides and speaker notes, against the two EIA pages: 95 are supported, 10 loosen or go a little beyond their wording, 2 are in neither page and none contradicts one. One of the two is the closing slide’s advice; the other ranks rooftop solar as the leading distributed resource, which the pages do not say. It is not a person’s review.
