Bring useful inputs
Set the reader, purpose, required points, sources and section budgets. Review extracted material from an upload, paste or URL before using it as grounding.
A useful article template is not a fill-in-the-blanks form — it is a format guide: heading hierarchy, expected sections, depth, and formatting that give generation a repeatable shape. Gixo applies that guidance during generation and checks the resulting draft before review.
An AI article template for SEO is a format-specific generation guide: it describes the expected heading hierarchy, sections, depth, and formatting while the words are generated for the topic. In Gixo, the selected content type carries those instructions into generation, and the workbench later checks structure, brief coverage, readability, links, and answer readiness. Model output still needs review, Quill does not run a plagiarism database check, and delivery metadata needs review. Quill adds Article JSON-LD and FAQPage JSON-LD for articles with an FAQ section to HTML exports and WordPress or Ghost delivery; HowTo schema is not generated. Validate what the receiving CMS retains.
This is an actual Quill export, with the input brief available alongside it. Use the workflow below to connect source material, structure, editing and delivery.
Nine numbered tips, each saying what to do, why it works and how to start, with a ranked summary table and EPA, USDA and FoodSafety.gov guidance linked in the text.
Write a numbered article of nine practical ways a household can reduce the food it throws away. Each item should say what to do, why it works and how to start. Include how to plan meals, store food, read date labels, use leftovers and handle scraps. Ground the advice in guidance published by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the U.S. Department of Agriculture and FoodSafety.gov, and cite those agency pages. Cite no other organisation. Do not quote statistics, percentages or dollar amounts; give practical advice and attribute each piece of guidance to the agency page it comes from.
Open the full export and compare its statements with the cited sources before reuse.
Set the reader, purpose, required points, sources and section budgets. Review extracted material from an upload, paste or URL before using it as grounding.
Review the outline, then the draft. Add structured blocks, edit selected passages and use Image Studio for permitted generation, photo selection and responsive insertion; retain attribution where required.
Review citations, wording and metadata. Use the supported export or connected destination for the current account; Markdown handoff and a live publishing connection are different delivery paths.
Power Edit starts from an active selection. You can give iterative or voice-transcribed instructions, choose a reply language, stop a streamed response, inspect the result and explicitly replace the selected range. Full-document context is reference material. Structured blocks have typed fields, item-level regeneration and previews; their AI field assistance is separate from their layout.
Use builder or advanced prompts with the subject and document context. Shape style, mood, lighting, palette, composition, camera and supported image dimensions. Inspect generated alternatives or a selected real photo, retain required source attribution and edit alternative text before insertion. Finishes and prompt edits create a new result; compare it with the original instead of assuming an edit is lossless.
Import options depend on the source type: pasted text, Markdown or HTML; document extraction; spreadsheet cells; image OCR; and supported media transcription. Review extracted material before drafting. Export settings include the supported format, theme, author, spacing, headers, footers and page appearance. Inspect the actual download because HTML, print PDF and editable Word represent structure differently.
A source-led draft needs human review. HTML, PDF and editable Word have different layout fidelity; connected publishing support is destination-specific.
The reason templates matter for AI content is simple: without clear format instructions, a model can return a plausible draft in the wrong shape. A template tells it what belongs in the piece — an answer-first introduction, relevant H2s, a comparison table, steps, or an FAQ where the chosen format calls for them.
A good template standardizes expectations, not text. Each article is newly generated from its topic, brief, and sources. Editors still check for missing sections, repeated phrasing, originality, and fit rather than assuming the template guarantees them.
| Element | What it guides | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Answer-first intro | States the answer in the first few sentences, no long wind-up | Helps readers find the answer; snippet selection is not guaranteed |
| Logical heading hierarchy | H2s/H3s mapped to expected subtopics, in expected order | The outline a crawler uses to understand the page |
| Required sections | Comparison table for commercial intent, step list for how-to, FAQ for long-tail | Completeness for the query type |
| Schema-aware visible structure | Clean HTML plus a real FAQ block | Provides visible content that matching JSON-LD can accurately describe |
| Consistent depth | A target length and required elements per article | Every piece in a cluster is thorough, not a mix of substantial and thin |
| Brand voice | Tone and voice guidance layered on top of the format | Output sounds like you, not generic/neutral |
In Gixo, the selected content type brings a format-specific style guide into generation. That guide describes the heading hierarchy, expected elements, target depth, and formatting, while the editorial brief adds required topics and questions. The workbench then reports deterministic issues in the generated result.
You pick the type, set writing controls, add the topic, brief, and reference material, then review whether the output followed the requested shape. Guidance plus checks is stronger than a bare prompt, but it is not a guarantee that every model response is complete.
Policy sources reviewed 9 October 2026: Google's AI content guidance calls for manual review of content and metadata. FAQ rich results ended 7 May 2026; HowTo rich results ended in September 2023. Valid descriptive markup can remain, but it does not promise Google visibility.
Inside Quill
Updated