Skip to content
Arc
Sign In Get started
Workflow-specific products Content, decks, visuals, briefs, proposals, legal, books, and project delivery each have a clearer buying path.
Review before delivery Draft, edit, collaborate, approve, and export in the same workspace.
Security + procurement path Security policy, support, and Azure Marketplace buying are public.
Microsoft AI Partner Azure Marketplace G2

A Smarter Way to Draft Proposals Than Qwilr

Qwilr documents interactive proposals, pricing, signing, analytics and AI or MCP workflows. Arc links uploaded source files to requirement answers, evidence review and retained buyer editions. Compare your required inputs, review decisions and buyer delivery format.

Try Gixo Arc View pricing

Gixo Arc is an AI proposal drafting tool that generates document-quality proposal content from your uploaded source files — up to 10 files per proposal, 500 MB each (64 MB for Office files) and 2 GB in total, across 10 accepted file types (PDF, DOCX, PPTX, TXT, XLSX, XLS, CSV, PNG, JPG, and JPEG), with scanned images read by OCR — then structures the draft using one of 21 proposal types and exports in 6 formats: PDF, DOCX, HTML, Markdown, JSON, and plain text. Arc costs $49 to $179 per seat per month with a 14-day no-card trial. Qwilr, by contrast, is a proposal delivery platform built around design-forward web templates, embedded pricing calculators, view analytics, and e-signatures, with AI Prefill, Smart Proposal Engine and MCP features on specified plans; its published pricing should be checked on its own site, as vendor tiers change. Choose Gixo when document quality and RFP-driven drafting matter most; choose Qwilr when interactive web delivery and tracking matter most.

From source material to reviewable draft

See what Arc helps your team review

Choose the proposal type, add the RFP, brief, notes, or prior work, then review a structured first draft before it reaches a client.

Create a proposal Analyze a proposal — free
  1. 1Add source materialRFPs, briefs, notes, decks, and prior work
  2. 2Draft to the proposal typeSections and structure follow the real opportunity
  3. 3Review before deliveryYour team checks facts, scope, pricing, and commitments
The Arc response workspace: a queue of buyer requirements marked Needs Verification, beside one requirement's response, its source file and a warning that no supplier evidence is linked.
What your team reviews. A buyer requirement beside its response, its source file and status, and a warning that no supplier evidence is linked yet. This is a real Arc screen captured on 10 October 2026 with a fictional sample. The response in it was prepared by hand, so read it for the review controls.
The Arc create page with RFP Response selected among the proposal types, and the upload step starting below it with no files added.
Where it starts. Choose a proposal type, add source material, and keep the drafting controls visible. Arc takes up to 10 source files per proposal, at up to 500 MB each (64 MB for Word, Excel and PowerPoint files) and 2 GB in total.
The first page of the sales proposal Arc wrote: the cover details, the notice that the buyer and bidder are fictional, and the start of the executive summary.
What Arc wrote. A proposal for an invented regional retailer: the buyer's own untested estimate of what stock-outs cost it (described as untested), what the supplier will deliver and own, the data connections and implementation approach, the launch timeline, a first-year price built from the bidder's rates, two case studies and the team. A separate reviewer agent read its 178 claims against the bidder's evidence file, the buyer's brief and the deal terms: 142 are supported, 36 add detail or an inference, none is absent from every input and none contradicts one. Every price line recomputes. It is not a person's review. PDFWord Follow three buyer questions through reviewer decisions to the returned workbook. That walkthrough is fictional and its answers and decisions are hand-authored; the returned file comes from Arc's exporter.

Check the current Qwilr workflow with your source pack

Vendor information reviewed on : Qwilr current AI and MCP plan features and pricing. Compare required source intake, approval authority, exact buyer output and integrations on the plan you would buy. These are vendor-published capabilities, not hands-on comparative test results.

Arc links the Draft, Review and Deliver tasks to the saved proposal revision, with literal source passage receipts and named reviewer decisions. Optional policy checks, buyer value assumptions and separate Lumen handoffs have explicit limits; inspect the current Arc guide before selecting a workflow.

What's the difference between Gixo and Qwilr for proposal drafting?

Both platforms help you create proposals. The fundamental difference is in what each tool optimizes for — interactive delivery versus document-quality drafting.

AI Drafting vs Template Design

Arc drafts from uploaded RFPs and company files and provides a requirement response workspace. Qwilr lists MCP on Starter and AI Prefill and Smart Proposal Engine on Scale. Test the relevant plan and automation document limits with the same opportunity inputs; AI assistance is not exclusive to Arc.

Source-First Context

Gixo extracts requirements from your RFP documents and synthesizes them into structured proposal sections. Qwilr starts from visual blocks and content modules. If your proposals are driven by source documents, Gixo's intake model is purpose-built for that workflow.

Document Export vs Web Pages

Gixo exports in 6 formats — PDF, DOCX, HTML, Markdown, JSON, and plain text — with professional themes for offline delivery and formal submissions. Qwilr delivers proposals as interactive web pages with embedded pricing calculators and view analytics. Different delivery models for different client expectations.

How does Gixo compare to Qwilr feature by feature?

Capability Gixo Arc Qwilr
Drafting approachAI generation from source filesVisual templates with plan-specific AI and MCP workflows
Source file uploadUp to 10 files per proposal, 500 MB each (64 MB for Office files), 2 GB total (PDF, DOCX, PPTX, TXT, XLSX, XLS, CSV, PNG, JPG, and JPEG)Ask Qwilr to demonstrate your exact source intake on the eligible AI or MCP plan
RFP requirement extractionAI-powered extraction, including OCR for scanned PDFsAsk Qwilr to demonstrate your required RFP extraction and evidence workflow
Proposal structures21 proposal typesVisual template library
Proposal deliveryDocument export in 6 formatsInteractive web pages
Embedded pricingNot includedInteractive pricing tables
View analyticsRecipient-specific tracked links with view and download countsPage-level analytics
E-signaturesSimple electronic signature, signed PDF with audit certificateBuilt-in acceptance
Rich text editorBuilt-in with inline AIBlock-based editor
CRM integrationsNo self-serve CRM syncHubSpot, Salesforce
Export formatsPDF, DOCX, HTML, Markdown, JSON, plain textInteractive web proposals and PDF export
Starting price$49 per seat per month, 14-day no-card trialPublished on qwilr.com; check the vendor's current pricing page
Inline AI editingSection-level refinementAI Prefill and Smart Proposal Engine on Scale; MCP on eligible plans

Gixo Arc rows describe the available workflow and limits. Qwilr rows describe its publicly positioned feature set as of mid-2026 and are not vendor quotes — confirm current features and pricing with Qwilr directly.

Gixo Arc proposal document exports, drafting limits and plans

The figures a buyer usually has to email support for, stated once.

SpecificationCurrent value
Source files per proposal10
Maximum size per file500 MB overall; 64 MB for Office files
Maximum total upload2 GB per proposal
Accepted file extensions10: .pdf, .docx, .pptx, .txt, .xlsx, .xls, .csv, .png, .jpg, and .jpeg
Proposal types21, spanning sales, RFP response, enterprise, quote, renewal, expansion, win-back, consulting, project, retainer, staffing, partnership, joint venture, sponsorship, internal business case, grant, investment, government, research, creative, and technology implementation
Export formats6: PDF, DOCX, HTML, Markdown, JSON, and plain text
Plan pricing (per seat per month)$49 Starter, $129 Professional, $149 Business, $179 Enterprise
Seat minimums1 / 2 / 5 / 10 seats respectively
Trial14-day no-card trial; there is no free tier

When should you choose Gixo instead of Qwilr?

Choose Gixo When

You respond to RFPs with dense source documents and need AI to synthesize them into structured first drafts. When document quality and formal PDF delivery matter more than interactive web pages. Best for consulting, professional services, and government proposals.

Choose Qwilr When

You need visually striking web-based proposals with embedded pricing calculators, e-signatures, and view tracking. When your sales process benefits from interactive delivery and its documented AI and template workflows fit your opportunity inputs.

Consider Both When

Your team drafts proposals from RFPs and source documents (Gixo for the writing) and also sends interactive sales proposals with pricing and tracking (Qwilr for the delivery). The tools serve different stages of the proposal lifecycle.

Comparison FAQ

Is Gixo a direct replacement for Qwilr?
Both support proposal creation and delivery. Arc links uploaded source files to requirement responses, evidence review and retained buyer editions. Qwilr documents interactive web proposals, AI or MCP assistance, pricing, signing and analytics. Test the input sources, review decisions and buyer formats required for your workflow.
Does Gixo offer interactive web proposals like Qwilr?
Arc offers recipient-specific tracked buyer links and reviewed buyer editions, as well as document exports. It does not claim Qwilr-style interactive quoting and payment collection. Qwilr documents interactive web proposal blocks, quoting, signing and payment workflows; evaluate the buyer experience you need.
Can Qwilr draft proposals from uploaded RFPs?
Qwilr now lists AI Prefill, Smart Proposal Engine and MCP workflows on specified plans. Ask it to demonstrate your exact RFP source intake and retained evidence. Arc directly supports uploaded buyer/company files and requirement review; this comparison does not claim that Qwilr lacks AI generation.
Does Gixo include e-signatures or view tracking?
Partly. Gixo focuses on the drafting stage — turning source files into strong first drafts. It includes simple electronic signature: each signer gets an emailed link to a frozen PDF of the proposal, and the completed copy gets an appended audit certificate, and Gixo records its SHA-256 fingerprint. It is not a qualified or certificate-based signature. Gixo can also create a recipient-specific tracked link with view and download counts and lightweight acceptance, which Gixo can email to the recipient or you can share yourself, with an alert to you when the recipient opens or downloads the proposal. It does not include recipient section-level engagement analytics. If you need those, pair Gixo's drafting with Qwilr or another delivery platform.
Which tool is better for RFP responses?
Test the same buyer RFP, company evidence, answer limits and required return file in both tools. Arc supports a requirement response matrix, named reviews, source passage receipts and supported questionnaire copies. Qwilr documents AI and interactive proposal workflows. No measured output or compliance superiority is established here.
What is a good Qwilr alternative for drafting proposals from RFPs?
Arc is a candidate for uploaded-source proposal drafting and requirement-level evidence review, with retained buyer editions and separate Lumen pitch-deck handoffs. Qwilr also offers AI and MCP workflows on eligible plans. Compare actual source intake, reviewer authority, outputs and automation conditions.
Does Gixo replace Qwilr's interactive proposal features like pricing tables and analytics?
Arc supports structured pricing schedules, tracked recipient links and recorded project outcome metrics. It does not provide self-serve CRM synchronization or Qwilr-style interactive quoting and payment collection. Qwilr lists interactive proposals and plan-specific AI, analytics and integration features. Confirm the exact plan and buyer workflow before replacing it.
How many source files can I upload to one Gixo proposal?
Up to 10 files per proposal, with a 500 MB general per-file cap, a 64 MB cap for Office files and a 2 GB cap across the whole proposal. Arc accepts 10 file extensions: .pdf, .docx, .pptx, .txt, .xlsx, .xls, .csv, .png, .jpg, and .jpeg. Scanned PDFs and images are read via OCR, so a photographed or faxed RFP still becomes usable source context.
What formats can Gixo export a proposal to?
Six: PDF, DOCX, HTML, Markdown, JSON, and plain text. PDF is the usual client-delivery format and carries the professional export themes; DOCX is the one to pick when a client or procurement portal requires an editable Word file; JSON is a structural export for developer use. Document exports are separate from Arc tracked buyer links and do not provide Qwilr-style interactive quoting.
How much does Gixo Arc cost compared to Qwilr?
Gixo Arc is $49 per seat per month on Starter (1 seat), $129 on Professional (2 seats minimum), $149 on Business (5 seats minimum), and $179 on Enterprise (10 seats minimum). It's a 14-day free trial (no card required), not an unlimited free tier — Gixo Arc has no standing $0 plan. After the trial, continued generation requires a paid plan. Qwilr publishes its own tiers on qwilr.com and changes them periodically, so compare against its current pricing page rather than a figure quoted on a third-party site.
How many proposal types does Gixo Arc support?
21. They cover sales, RFP response, enterprise, quote or estimate, renewal, expansion, win-back, consulting, project, retainer, staffing, partnership, joint venture, sponsorship, internal business case, grant, investment, government, research, creative, and technology implementation. The type you pick sets the expected sections and depth; your uploaded files supply the opportunity content.
Gixo Arc Proposal Pricing AI Proposal Generator Better Proposals Alternative PandaDoc Alternative AI Proposal Generator

Try Source-First Proposal Drafting

Upload RFPs and source files. Let AI draft structured proposals from your context. Document-quality output with professional PDF themes.

Start Drafting View pricing

Deterministic, no account needed, nothing stored.

See all free Gixo tools

Updated

More from Gixo

Keep exploring