Make the intake specific
Supply the parties, document kind, jurisdiction, obligations, dates and reference material. Review imported content and retain its source identity before using it in a new matter.
Prepare terms-of-service drafts that match the actual product and still expect review
Use Gixo when product, operations, and legal teams need a first draft shaped by platform rules, subscriptions, user content, privacy references, and dispute structure before counsel review and publishing.
An AI terms-of-service generator is a structured drafting workflow that prepares a first ToS draft shaped by your actual platform rules, billing and subscription structure, user-content and IP terms, and privacy-policy references — not a generic web-template filler. Gixo's version captures platform-specific rules, acceptable-use and account logic, and dispute assumptions during intake, then generates a draft built for legal and product review before publishing. It does not provide legal advice or certify compliance on its own; the draft still requires qualified legal review.
Lex · real output
Read the matter facts and the resulting draft together.
This is a real Lex export for invented parties. Inspect the input and clauses as a worked example, with professional review kept separate from automated drafting and checks.
Master Services Agreement: analytics services (worked example)
A master services agreement of 17 numbered parts: definitions, scope of services, service levels and change orders, fees, intellectual property, confidentiality, data protection, warranties, indemnification, limitation of liability, force majeure, term and termination, transition assistance, governing law, general provisions and schedules. Its first page says it is a worked example, not a legal document.
Inspect the source brief or data
Draft a Master Services Agreement: analytics services between Larkfield Analytics Ltd (Supplier) and Harbourside Housing Association (Customer). Governing law: England and Wales. Effective date: 2027-02-01. Term: Two years from the effective date, renewable by written agreement. Confidentiality: Five years after the agreement ends. The Supplier provides survey design, data engineering and dashboard services to the Customer under statements of work agreed in writing. Excluded: any service not set out in a signed statement of work. Dependencies: the Customer provides access to its systems and a named contact for each statement of work. State on the first page that the parties, people and addresses in this agreement are invented and that it is a worked example, not a legal document. The notice email address of Larkfield Analytics Ltd is notices@larkfield-analytics.example and of Harbourside Housing Association is notices@harbourside-housing.example (both invented).
Read the sample review notes
Read mechanically against the intake, not by a lawyer: 10 of the 12 facts the intake gave are in the draft (the two registration numbers are not printed), nothing is left as a placeholder, and it states two terms the intake did not give, 30 days and 10 Business Days, which Lex chose.
Inspect clauses and changes
Use the legal workspace's permitted structural tools, Draft Checks and review paths. Compare proposed changes with the saved draft and original material; unsupported Word edits must be handled explicitly.
Approve the exact version
Have qualified counsel review enforceability, local requirements and the actual commercial intent. Check the current approval state and the downloaded document after a change.
Structured clause proposals and permitted changes
Select the target clause and give Ask Lex a bounded instruction. Missing facts remain visible for review. Inspect the before-and-after proposal, required clause checks and any explicit outside-matrix or mandatory-clause override before versioned application. Use the legal workspace's structural allowlist rather than assuming every general content-editor block is available.
Playbooks, source evidence and obligations
Inspect immutable playbook versions, anchored findings, provenance and precedent variants before staging a change. Matters retain original sources, quotation findings and source-version comparisons. Review extracted obligations for timing, ownership and source revision; negotiation turns and agreement-pack review cells have their own decisions and current-version requirements.
Original Word, redlines and the delivery receipt
Original-format Word export, tracked changes against an original and saved-version redlines are separate paths. Unsupported edits must be surfaced rather than silently claimed as preserved. Inspect the layout, validator notes and downloaded file, then retain its delivery receipt. Counsel's review applies to the actual matter and version.
AI contract review, key terms and review of every document
Every contract in Lex, drafted or imported, gets an AI contract review: each clause the document type expects marked present, weak or absent; up to 25 risks with a level, the party each falls on, why it matters and replacement wording; and provisions that cannot both be followed. Every quotation is checked against the contract text, findings are decided before approval, and there is no single risk score. The same review reads the key terms and obligations with the words they quote and proposes them into the Agreement Pack. Review every document puts up to 25 documents of an Agreement Pack, or up to 200 in a matter, into one table with your own questions as columns and an Excel export. Approvers can be named in order, and signing supports up to 10 signers with an optional signing order and automatic reminders; it is a simple electronic signature, not a qualified one. A qualified reviewer still decides what the contract says.
Lex does not provide legal advice or certify compliance. The public specimen is not a universally reusable legal template. Word fidelity depends on the supported original-document and saved-version path; unrestricted Power Edit and image insertion are not legal editing features.
Additional product example
What does an AI terms of service generator need to produce a usable draft?
The job is not to ask AI for a legal answer. The job is to prepare a draft or artifact that a qualified reviewer can actually work with.
Platform-specific rules
Capture the product model, acceptable use rules, and account-management logic before the first draft is generated.
Billing and subscription structure
Shape the draft around subscriptions, renewals, cancellations, credits, and service changes instead of relying on generic web-template language.
Content, IP, and user-upload terms
Bring ownership, licenses, DMCA or notice-and-takedown structure, and user-content assumptions into the drafting workflow.
Privacy references and obligations
Tie the draft to privacy-policy and data-handling references without pretending a terms draft alone makes the product compliant.
Jurisdiction-aware legal structure
Reference files and governing context can shape the draft. Cited sources can show which draft sentences are supported by supplied reference files. This in-app support does not establish legal authority or statutory compliance and is not inserted into the contract or its exports; reviewers still check the facts and law independently.
Review before publishing
After the first draft, Lex runs an AI contract review of the whole contract, with every quotation checked against the text, beside rule checks: clause coverage against a versioned playbook, clause-conflict detection, and defined-term and cross-reference checks. Findings, tracked-change DOCX redlines, comments, review state, assignees, due dates, and version history all stay attached to the same document. A contract imported from Word can go back as that same DOCX, with the Lex edits shown as Word tracked changes; where Lex cannot track an edit faithfully, such as inside a field, an existing revision, a header or a footer, it refuses the export instead of altering the document. Reviewers still verify every clause and conclusion.
How do product and legal teams use an AI terms of service generator?
1
Describe the product and user model
Start with the site, SaaS product, or app, then capture the user journey, billing model, and user-content assumptions.
2
Set the operating rules
Bring acceptable use, suspension, termination, IP, privacy references, and dispute assumptions into the intake before generation.
3
Generate and review the draft
Prepare the first draft in the workspace so legal and product reviewers can tighten the clauses that matter for the actual service.
4
Export for publishing or counsel handoff
Export in PDF, DOCX, HTML, and TXT once the draft is ready for the next review or publishing workflow.
How does Gixo's AI terms of service generator compare to alternatives?
| Capability | Gixo | Template generators | Consent platforms | General AI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Main job | Structured ToS drafting | Generic forms | Consent workflow | Prompt output |
| Platform-specific terms | Yes | Test on the same inputs | Ask the vendor | Test on the same inputs |
| Privacy-policy and data references | Yes | Test on the same inputs | Workflow layer | Test on the same inputs |
| Direct legal advice | Not included | No | No | No |
| Review workflow on the document | Yes | Test on the same inputs | Ask the vendor | Verify current document and review tools |
The other columns describe what each kind of tool is generally for, not a test of a named product, and products differ. Run the same brief and reference files through anything on your shortlist, then compare the draft, the review trail and the export.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is this page for startup or product teams, not just legal teams?
Yes. The workflow is useful when product, operations, and legal need a structured first draft that reflects how the service actually works.
Does Gixo make my product compliant on its own?
No. Gixo helps prepare the terms draft. Compliance still depends on the product, privacy practices, billing flows, and qualified legal review.
Can I include privacy and user-content terms?
Yes. The workflow supports privacy references, user-content rules, IP structure, and dispute-resolution assumptions as part of the first draft.
Does Gixo provide legal advice?
Gixo helps prepare regulated work. It does not provide legal advice, certify compliance, or replace professional review.
What is an AI terms of service generator?
An AI terms of service generator is a workflow that prepares a first terms-of-service draft shaped by your product's actual platform rules, billing and subscription structure, user-content and IP terms, and privacy-policy references, so legal and product reviewers start from a draft built for the real service instead of a generic web template. Gixo helps prepare this draft; it does not provide legal advice, certify compliance, or replace professional review.
What does the draft cover?
Based on the intake workflow, the draft is shaped around platform-specific rules and account-management logic, billing and subscription structure (renewals, cancellations, credits, service changes), content/IP and user-upload terms, privacy-policy references, and jurisdiction-aware legal structure, before handoff for legal and product review.
Gixo Legal & Compliance
Policy Generator
Legal Docs for Startups
Jurisdiction-Aware Drafting
Pricing
Updated
More from Gixo