Make the intake specific
Supply the parties, document kind, jurisdiction, obligations, dates and reference material. Review imported content and retain its source identity before using it in a new matter.
Prepare NDA first drafts your reviewers can actually work through
Gixo helps teams prepare mutual or unilateral NDAs from structured facts, party roles, governing-law context, and reference files. The output is a first draft for review, not a substitute for legal judgment.
An AI NDA generator is a tool that prepares mutual or unilateral NDA first drafts from structured facts — party roles, governing-law context, and reference files — for a reviewer to finish, rather than a substitute for legal judgment. Gixo supports up to 10 parties with distinct disclosing and receiving roles, lets you choose mutual or unilateral structure, and can use uploaded prior NDAs and clause banks as reference input. The draft then moves through a review and export workflow instead of arriving as a final, unreviewed document: reviewers verify how those inputs shaped the draft before export.
Lex · real output
Read the matter facts and the resulting draft together.
This is a real Lex export for invented parties. Inspect the input and clauses as a worked example, with professional review kept separate from automated drafting and checks.
Mutual Non-Disclosure Agreement (worked example)
A mutual non-disclosure agreement of 14 numbered clauses between two invented parties: definitions, what counts as confidential information, exclusions, the receiving party's obligations, permitted disclosures, return of materials, remedies, term, survival, governing law, notices and signature blocks. Its first page says it is a worked example, not a legal document.
Inspect the source brief or data
Draft a Mutual Non-Disclosure Agreement between Larkfield Analytics Ltd (Party A) and Fenwick & Dale Stores Ltd (Party B). Governing law: England and Wales. Effective date: 2027-01-15. Term: Two years from the effective date. Confidentiality: Three years after disclosure. A mutual agreement: each party may disclose and receive confidential information. State on the first page that the parties, people and addresses in this agreement are invented and that it is a worked example, not a legal document. The notice email address of Larkfield Analytics Ltd is notices@larkfield-analytics.example and of Fenwick & Dale Stores Ltd is notices@fenwick-dale.example (both invented).
Read the sample review notes
Read mechanically against the intake, not by a lawyer: all 12 facts the intake gave are in the draft, nothing is left as a placeholder, and it states no term the intake did not give.
Inspect clauses and changes
Use the legal workspace's permitted structural tools, Draft Checks and review paths. Compare proposed changes with the saved draft and original material; unsupported Word edits must be handled explicitly.
Approve the exact version
Have qualified counsel review enforceability, local requirements and the actual commercial intent. Check the current approval state and the downloaded document after a change.
Structured clause proposals and permitted changes
Select the target clause and give Ask Lex a bounded instruction. Missing facts remain visible for review. Inspect the before-and-after proposal, required clause checks and any explicit outside-matrix or mandatory-clause override before versioned application. Use the legal workspace's structural allowlist rather than assuming every general content-editor block is available.
Playbooks, source evidence and obligations
Inspect immutable playbook versions, anchored findings, provenance and precedent variants before staging a change. Matters retain original sources, quotation findings and source-version comparisons. Review extracted obligations for timing, ownership and source revision; negotiation turns and agreement-pack review cells have their own decisions and current-version requirements.
Original Word, redlines and the delivery receipt
Original-format Word export, tracked changes against an original and saved-version redlines are separate paths. Unsupported edits must be surfaced rather than silently claimed as preserved. Inspect the layout, validator notes and downloaded file, then retain its delivery receipt. Counsel's review applies to the actual matter and version.
AI contract review, key terms and review of every document
Every contract in Lex, drafted or imported, gets an AI contract review: each clause the document type expects marked present, weak or absent; up to 25 risks with a level, the party each falls on, why it matters and replacement wording; and provisions that cannot both be followed. Every quotation is checked against the contract text, findings are decided before approval, and there is no single risk score. The same review reads the key terms and obligations with the words they quote and proposes them into the Agreement Pack. Review every document puts up to 25 documents of an Agreement Pack, or up to 200 in a matter, into one table with your own questions as columns and an Excel export. Approvers can be named in order, and signing supports up to 10 signers with an optional signing order and automatic reminders; it is a simple electronic signature, not a qualified one. A qualified reviewer still decides what the contract says.
Lex does not provide legal advice or certify compliance. The public specimen is not a universally reusable legal template. Word fidelity depends on the supported original-document and saved-version path; unrestricted Power Edit and image insertion are not legal editing features.
Additional product example
A mutual NDA Lex drafted
Drafted by Lex on 3 October 2026 from the intake shown and exported unedited as a PDF and a Word file. The parties are invented, and the first page says so. It is a specimen, not a legal document.
Mutual NDA · 7-page PDF · 1,592 words
Mutual Non-Disclosure Agreement (worked example)
A mutual non-disclosure agreement of 14 numbered clauses between two invented parties: definitions, what counts as confidential information, exclusions, the receiving party's obligations, permitted disclosures, return of materials, remedies, term, survival, governing law, notices and signature blocks. Its first page says it is a worked example, not a legal document.
The intake Lex was given
Draft a Mutual Non-Disclosure Agreement between Larkfield Analytics Ltd (Party A) and Fenwick & Dale Stores Ltd (Party B). Governing law: England and Wales. Effective date: 2027-01-15. Term: Two years from the effective date. Confidentiality: Three years after disclosure. A mutual agreement: each party may disclose and receive confidential information. State on the first page that the parties, people and addresses in this agreement are invented and that it is a worked example, not a legal document. The notice email address of Larkfield Analytics Ltd is notices@larkfield-analytics.example and of Fenwick & Dale Stores Ltd is notices@fenwick-dale.example (both invented).
Read mechanically against the intake, not by a lawyer: all 12 facts the intake gave are in the draft, nothing is left as a placeholder, and it states no term the intake did not give.
What do teams need from an AI NDA generator?
The job is not to ask AI for a legal answer. The job is to prepare a draft or artifact that a qualified reviewer can actually work with.
Multi-party support
Capture up to 10 parties with distinct disclosing and receiving roles for consortium, diligence, investor, or vendor contexts.
Mutual or unilateral structure
Shape the draft around how confidentiality actually flows instead of starting from a generic one-size-fits-all template.
Jurisdiction-aware drafting
Reference files and governing context can shape the draft. Cited sources can show which draft sentences are supported by supplied reference files. This in-app support does not establish legal authority or statutory compliance and is not inserted into the contract or its exports; reviewers still check the facts and law independently.
Term and confidentiality controls
Define the time limits and survival periods the reviewers need to inspect rather than relying on fixed template defaults.
Reference-file input
Use prior NDAs and clause banks to keep the next draft closer to your team’s working language.
Review and export workflow
After the first draft, Lex runs an AI contract review of the whole contract, with every quotation checked against the text, beside rule checks: clause coverage against a versioned playbook, clause-conflict detection, and defined-term and cross-reference checks. Findings, tracked-change DOCX redlines, comments, review state, assignees, due dates, and version history all stay attached to the same document. A contract imported from Word can go back as that same DOCX, with the Lex edits shown as Word tracked changes; where Lex cannot track an edit faithfully, such as inside a field, an existing revision, a header or a footer, it refuses the export instead of altering the document. Reviewers still verify every clause and conclusion.
How does AI NDA drafting work in Gixo?
1
Define the NDA structure and parties
Choose mutual or unilateral, then add the parties, roles, and representative details that matter to the agreement.
2
Set governing law and confidentiality terms
Capture the jurisdiction, duration, and special instructions that should shape the draft.
3
Upload prior NDAs if needed
Use reference files and precedent language to inform the draft instead of rebuilding from scratch.
4
Review, refine, and export
Use the editor and review workflow, then export in PDF, DOCX, HTML, and TXT once the draft is ready for the next step.
What does Gixo's AI NDA generator include?
| Capability | Gixo | Template sites | General AI | Manual drafting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party intake | Structured | Fixed fields | Test on the same inputs | Interview based |
| Multi-party NDA support (up to 10 parties) | Yes | Check its party limit | Manual | Yes |
| Governing-law-aware draft | Yes | Template dependent | Test on the same inputs | Yes |
| Reference-file input (prior NDAs, clause banks) | Yes | Ask if it accepts your files | Paste or upload; verify current support | Yes |
| NDA structures supported | Mutual or unilateral (2 core structures) | Varies | Varies | Varies |
| Export formats | PDF, DOCX, HTML, and TXT | Varies | Verify current file/export tools | N/A |
| Legal advice | Not included | No | No | Professional |
The other columns describe what each kind of tool is generally for, not a test of a named product, and products differ. Run the same brief and reference files through anything on your shortlist, then compare the draft, the review trail and the export.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can Gixo draft NDAs with more than two parties?
Yes. Gixo supports up to 10 parties with distinct roles and representative details.
Does it support both mutual and unilateral NDAs?
Yes. The draft can be shaped around either confidentiality model before generation begins.
Can I use my existing NDA as a reference?
Yes. Teams can upload prior NDAs and related reference files to keep the next draft closer to established language and structure.
Does Gixo provide legal advice?
Gixo helps prepare regulated work. It does not provide legal advice, certify compliance, or replace professional review.
What is an AI NDA generator?
An AI NDA generator is a tool that prepares mutual or unilateral NDA first drafts from structured intake, party roles, governing-law context, and optional reference files. Gixo's version supports up to 10 parties, produces a reviewable draft rather than a final agreement, and does not provide legal advice or certify compliance.
Is an AI-generated NDA a final document I can sign?
No. Gixo's AI NDA generator produces a first draft for a reviewer to work through, not a substitute for legal judgment. It does not provide legal advice, certify compliance, or replace professional review.
Gixo Legal & Compliance
AI Legal Documents
Multi-Party Agreements
Jurisdiction-Aware Drafting
Pricing
Updated
More from Gixo