Bring useful inputs
Set the reader, purpose, required points, sources and section budgets. Review extracted material from an upload, paste or URL before using it as grounding.
An AI content writing tool for teams that need review, not chaos
Gixo gives content teams one workspace for strong first drafts with brand voice, evidence grounding, and references, plus comments, mentions, review states, assignees, due dates, permissions, guest approvals, activity history, versions, and publishing history.
What your plan includes.Comments, mentions and sharing with named people are on Professional plans and above — from $79 per seat a month, minimum three seats. Writing, checks, exports, public share links and publishing are on every plan, and Brand Voice is on Starter and above. The 14-day trial works like Starter, so it includes writing, checks, exports, publishing and Brand Voice, but does not include comments.
For membership, public-link policies, recorded activity and recovery, review the shared platform controls and Trust Centre. Quill publication approval is a separate optional owner policy.
Gixo is an AI content writing tool for teams that keeps writing and review in one shared workspace: strong first drafts with brand voice, evidence grounding, and references, plus comments, mentions, review states, assignees, due dates, permissions, and guest approvals attached directly to the document. Saved-document versions and publishing history help reviewers follow supported changes. Team owners and admins can inspect recorded team audit events, with limited path coverage rather than a complete record of every action. Finished content publishes directly from that workspace rather than moving through separate chat threads, docs, and email attachments.
Quill · real output
Start with the brief. Inspect the finished article.
This is an actual Quill export, with the input brief available alongside it. Use the workflow below to connect source material, structure, editing and delivery.
Pre-Launch Checklist for a New Business Website
Checklist items grouped by phase, each with a priority tag and a way to check it, with links to Google, W3C and FTC guidance for the search, accessibility and security items.
Inspect the source brief or data
Write an actionable checklist for a small business about to launch a new website. Group the items under content, search visibility, accessibility, performance, security and privacy, analytics, and what to verify on launch day. Each item should be a single action someone can tick off and should say how to check it. Cite published guidance for the search, accessibility and security items.
Read the sample review notes
Open the full export and compare its statements with the cited sources before reuse.
Shape and refine
Review the outline, then the draft. Add structured blocks, edit selected passages and use Image Studio for permitted generation, photo selection and responsive insertion; retain attribution where required.
Choose the delivery path
Review citations, wording and metadata. Use the supported export or connected destination for the current account; Markdown handoff and a live publishing connection are different delivery paths.
Selected-text editing and structured blocks
Power Edit starts from an active selection. You can give iterative or voice-transcribed instructions, choose a reply language, stop a streamed response, inspect the result and explicitly replace the selected range. Full-document context is reference material. Structured blocks have typed fields, item-level regeneration and previews; their AI field assistance is separate from their layout.
Image Studio and image revision
Use builder or advanced prompts with the subject and document context. Shape style, mood, lighting, palette, composition, camera and supported image dimensions. Inspect generated alternatives or a selected real photo, retain required source attribution and edit alternative text before insertion. Finishes and prompt edits create a new result; compare it with the original instead of assuming an edit is lossless.
Import, export and delivery settings
Import options depend on the source type: pasted text, Markdown or HTML; document extraction; spreadsheet cells; image OCR; and supported media transcription. Review extracted material before drafting. Export settings include the supported format, theme, author, spacing, headers, footers and page appearance. Inspect the actual download because HTML, print PDF and editable Word represent structure differently.
A source-led draft needs human review. HTML, PDF and editable Word have different layout fidelity; connected publishing support is destination-specific.
What does an AI content writing tool for teams actually include?
Turn briefs, source material, and existing drafts into structured content, then keep editing, evidence review, collaboration, transformation, export, and publishing attached to the same document.
Shared workspace
All drafts, revisions, and approvals stay in one place instead of jumping between chat threads, docs, and email attachments.
Review threads with accountability
Comments, mentions, review state, assignees, and due dates keep review work attached to the document instead of external checklists.
Permissions and guest approvals
Use role-based permissions and guest approval flows when internal reviewers, clients, or outside stakeholders need controlled access.
Activity and version history
Track who changed what, when it changed, and how the document moved from draft to approved version to published asset.
Shared voice and structure
Strong first shots, reusable brand voice settings, evidence grounding, references, and structured editing keep output consistent without turning the team into prompt specialists.
Finish and ship in one place
Publish directly to connected WordPress and Ghost sites, export in PDF, DOCX, HTML, Markdown, TXT, and JSON, and keep the publishing trail attached to the source document.
What does Gixo's AI content writing tool for teams add to an AI writing assistant?
| Capability | What it covers |
|---|---|
| Shared workspace | Drafts, revisions, and approvals stay in one place instead of chat threads, docs, and email attachments |
| Review threads | Comments, mentions, review state, assignees, and due dates attached directly to the document |
| Permissions and guest approvals | Role-based permissions plus guest approval flows for outside stakeholders and clients |
| Activity and version history | Tracks who changed what, when, and how a document moved from draft to approved to published |
| Shared voice and structure | Reusable brand voice settings, evidence grounding, references, and structured editing for consistent output |
| Publishing | Direct publishing to connected WordPress and Ghost sites, plus export in PDF, DOCX, HTML, Markdown, TXT, and JSON for channels like Substack |
AI content writing tool for teams: frequently asked questions
How do multiple writers collaborate in Gixo?
Writers and editors work in the same shared workspace. Review happens through comments, mentions, review state, assignees, and due dates attached directly to grounded, referenced content.
What team controls are built in?
Gixo supports role-based permissions, guest approvals, activity history, version history, and publishing history so teams can manage both internal and external review cleanly.
Can we track who changed a document?
Yes. Gixo keeps activity and version history so the team can see how a document changed over time and what version was ultimately approved or published.
Does Gixo support contractors or outside reviewers?
Yes. Guest approval flows and scoped access make it possible to involve outside stakeholders without giving away full workspace control.
Where does publishing fit for teams?
Publishing is part of the same workflow. Gixo publishes directly to connected WordPress and Ghost sites and uses export for channels like Substack that are outside the direct path.
What is an AI content writing tool for teams?
It's a shared workspace where a team writes, reviews, and publishes content together: AI produces a strong first draft with brand voice, evidence grounding, and references, and the team layers on comments, mentions, review states, assignees, due dates, permissions, and guest approvals directly on that document, with activity, version, and publishing history kept alongside it.
How is this different from a single-user AI writing tool?
For a team, evaluate the drafting and review workflow together. Gixo supports role-based permissions, guest approvals, review state, assignees, and activity/version/publishing history. Compare current plans and try a writer-to-editor handoff before choosing a tool.
Is this an AI writing assistant?
Yes. Quill pairs AI drafting and editing with brand voice, evidence grounding, review states, assignees, and version history. A team can review the saved document and its sources before approving a revision for delivery.
What should we look for in the best AI writing assistant for a team?
Test brand voice with your own samples, inspect how supplied sources support claims, and run a review handoff with comments, assignees, and version history. Check permissions and publishing support on the plan you intend to buy. Review states help coordinate work; release approval applies to a saved revision, and later changes need review again.
Give the team one content workspace to finish the job
Turn briefs, source material, and existing drafts into structured content, then keep editing, evidence review, collaboration, transformation, export, and publishing attached to the same document.
Set a structured, versioned editorial brief — primary keyword, search intent, audience, required topics, and the questions to answer — that flows into generation as coverage requirements, choose the source scope and evidence standard before generation, inspect citations afterward, and apply configurable writing and terminology controls during review.
Inside Quill
Prepare review ownership and feedback in context
Updated
More from Gixo