Frame the decision
Name the audience, requested decision and source pack. Review imported tables and extracted text; record gaps instead of allowing a polished narrative to conceal them.
Prepare market-analysis drafts for investor review from the reports, internal figures and assumptions you supply. Business attempts source-based number reconciliation and requests uploaded-file citation markers where supported. Check missing references, unrepaired figures and the meaning of every material claim before presenting the analysis.
AI briefs for startup founders are draft market analyses covering market sizing, competitors and go-to-market assumptions. Business organizes the selected material into editable KPI, steps and pros-and-cons sections, attempts source-number reconciliation and requests numbered markers. Repair can retain original figures and references can be missing. Review market definitions, periods and source support before sharing; the draft does not establish the research coverage or judgment of a commissioned consulting engagement.
Inspect an actual Business report. A readable decision brief needs the question, supplied evidence, options, assumptions and next decision—not just a shorter source document.
A decision, options compared on stated criteria, risks and a roadmap, with statements in the analysis labelled Fact, Inference or Assumption. The decision, lists and some summary sentences carry no label.
Business question: Which actions should a small business that stores customer personal information take first to protect it and to be ready if it is exposed? Decision maker: The owner of a small business. Timeframe: The next quarter. Context: A small business collects customer personal information and keeps it in paper files and on computers. It has no dedicated security staff. Refer to it as 'the business' throughout and do not give it a name. Options: Take stock of the personal information it keeps and where it is stored; Reduce what it keeps to what the business needs; Lock down the information it keeps with practical safeguards; Prepare a plan for responding to a data breach. Criteria: How much personal information at risk it removes or protects; How realistic it is for a small team without security specialists; How well it limits the harm if information is exposed. Constraints: No dedicated security staff; Limited time and budget.
Open the full export and compare its statements with the cited sources before reuse.
Name the audience, requested decision and source pack. Review imported tables and extracted text; record gaps instead of allowing a polished narrative to conceal them.
Separate supplied facts, calculated values, assumptions and recommendations. For variance work, reconcile the period, unit, baseline and actual value before interpreting the direction of a difference.
Use options, trade-offs, risks and named next actions. Review the final artifact and, when using Analyst calculations, inspect the calculation evidence separately from the narrative.
Select source documents, case context, working notes, assumptions, options and decision constraints before generation. Inspect claims, metrics, exact quotations, source tables and conflicting figures. Review decisions are scoped to the source or artifact and can become stale after evidence changes; unresolved evidence should stay visible.
Keep investment, recurring costs, benefits, delays, growth, discount assumptions and scenario probabilities explicit. Inspect deterministic cash flow and the available return, payback and sensitivity outputs. Compare scenarios before selection, and inspect the formula workbook or calculation receipt separately from the narrative recommendation.
Inspect the dossier's source tables, working rows and columns, calculation ledger and workbook handoff. Metric packs retain reviewable calculation and source context. Preview source replacements for a new period before accepting them. Execution records distinguish an action owner, baseline, target, measured value, data source and the reason for a status change.
A calculation can be replayable while the supplied inputs remain wrong. A generated report is decision support, not independent diligence, audit assurance or investment advice.
From pre-seed to Series A, prepare market-analysis drafts from the evidence and assumptions you supply. Use the block editor to refine the structure, then review original figures and citation support before investor use.
Business attempts to reconcile figures in draft paragraphs, lists and table body cells against supplied source material. Some values can remain unchanged when repair fails. Check TAM definitions, growth periods, financial assumptions and the cited passage before using the figure in investor materials.
Inline [1], [2] references to the files you upload, with a complete Sources section. Show investors that the claims you took from your sources are backed by traceable evidence, not just plausible AI-generated text.
Structure your materials with 20+ semantic blocks — KPIs, checklists, steps, pros/cons, CTAs, and more. Output looks professionally formatted, not like raw AI text pasted into a document.
Save your industry reports, competitor data, and market research into workspaces. Reuse the same source documents across your pitch deck appendix, board brief, and strategy plan without re-uploading.
Quick AI gives you 3 instant actions on selected text: rewrite, simplify and expand. Power Edit opens a full AI dialog for deeper rewrites. Polish your investor materials without leaving the editor.
Use a structured drafting and source-review workflow for the material you already hold. Business provides supported terminology checks, best-effort number reconciliation and generated-draft citation findings. It does not establish the same research scope, judgment or cost basis as a commissioned consulting engagement.
Founders need to distinguish market evidence from assumptions before presenting a business case. Check the dates and scope of customer research, industry reports and internal figures. Business organizes that material into editable sections, attempts source-based number reconciliation and requests citation markers. Reconciliation can retain original figures, and missing or misplaced references still need author review. Validate the market definitions and conclusion before sharing the brief.
Investors evaluate founders partly on how well they understand their market. A pitch deck appendix filled with uncited numbers signals carelessness. When you upload your research, Brief Mode in Gixo Business writes the brief to cite the TAM estimates and growth rates it takes from those files, with inline [1], [2] references and a complete Sources section; the model places the markers, so check for any it missed. The block-based editor with 20+ semantic blocks gives your appendix materials professional formatting — KPI blocks for key metrics, step blocks for go-to-market plans, pros/cons blocks for competitive positioning. Save your research documents in workspaces and reuse them across your pitch appendix, board brief, and strategy plan. Founders who present cited, source-grounded analyses consistently report stronger investor confidence and faster fundraising timelines.
Upload industry reports and competitor data into a saved workspace. Describe the startup question and intended audience, add the sources you want to use, and review the proposed outline and missing evidence before generating. Your sources persist for reuse across briefs.
Business generates the draft from the reviewed question, outline and source material. It attempts to reconcile figures and requests numbered uploaded-file citation markers where supported. Review source dates, market definitions, unrepaired figures and marker placement before investor use.
Structure your output with KPI blocks, step blocks, and pros/cons blocks. Use Quick AI for instant edits or Power Edit for deeper rewrites. The result looks professionally formatted, not like raw AI text.
Export to PDF as investor appendix materials. The sourced numbers, inline citations, and structured formatting give VCs confidence that your thesis is backed by real data, not founder optimism.
| Evaluation area | Gixo Business | What to check in consulting engagements and founder research |
|---|---|---|
| Job and inputs | Organize the company evidence and decision question into a draft; validate the underlying assumptions. | Test the current product or scoped service against the same question, sources and deliverable. |
| Evidence review | Inspect source coverage, uploaded-file citation markers and generated-draft Evidence and citation findings. | Check source support and current research capabilities; a citation alone does not confirm the conclusion. |
| Revision and delivery | Edit the brief, retain saved versions and review the final export. | Test the actual review, collaboration, version and export workflow you need. |
| Timing and responsibility | Generation time varies with the job and source pack; accountable people review the result. | Compare the agreed scope and review responsibilities rather than assume fixed speed or price. |
From initial idea validation to post-funding board reporting, every stage benefits from structured business intelligence.
Updated