Create a roundup article with a transparent theme, selection method, comparable entries, attributed insights, synthesis, and takeaways. The active guide targets 2,000 words, asks the model for 10 structural elements and then checks the draft for them, keeps source review explicit, and keeps review before export.
Details
| Topic | Details | What to know |
|---|---|---|
| Target length | Approximately 2,000 words | Designed for the depth and reading experience expected from this format. |
| Required structure | 10 required elements | Requested in the prompt, then reported as detected or missing on the workspace checklist. |
| Tone and voice | Comprehensive, comparative, and recommendation-focused; Active voice | Keeps the writing style aligned with the selected format. |
| Audience | Shoppers wanting options, researchers comparing multiple products, gift buyers. | Shapes the draft for the people most likely to read and use it. |
| Source handling | Generation-time sources and citation review | Sources captured at generation are listed for review, with inline source links where the draft cites them. |
| Delivery | 2 WordPress/Ghost site connections; PDF, DOCX, HTML, Markdown, TXT, and JSON | Export the finished content or publish it through a connected destination. |
Provide the theme, audience, selection criteria, candidate entries or interviews, source links, attribution rules, and the patterns or decision the roundup should illuminate.
The active guide targets approximately 2,000 words and injects 10 required structural elements using a comprehensive, comparative, and recommendation-focused tone for shoppers wanting options, researchers comparing multiple products, gift buyers..
Yes. The Roundup opens in the Quill workspace for editing and team review. You can add sources for review, render APA, MLA, Chicago, or Harvard citations, export in PDF, DOCX, HTML, Markdown, TXT, and JSON, or publish to a supported CMS destination.
An AI roundup article generator synthesizes multiple examples, products, sources, or expert contributions around one theme. It preserves attribution, applies a consistent selection method, identifies patterns, and adds editorial synthesis beyond a list of entries.
What to provide: Provide the theme, audience, selection criteria, candidate entries or interviews, source links, attribution rules, and the patterns or decision the roundup should illuminate.
The Roundup style guide below is read from the Gixo source at request time. Most of it is written into the generation prompt to steer the draft. A smaller part is enforced by code after the model answers. The editorial judgments stay with you — so they are listed separately rather than folded into one promise.
These are instructions, not checks. They shape what the model is asked to produce; nothing afterwards verifies that the tone landed or that the draft suits the audience. That is what step 3 is for.
Introduction & Selection Criteria, Product/Service #1 (Mini Review), Products #2-8 (Mini Reviews), Comparison Overview, Best Overall Pick, Best Budget Option, Best Premium Choice, Best for Specific Uses, Where to Buy Each, Conclusion
Comprehensive, comparative, and recommendation-focused · Active voice
Shoppers wanting options, researchers comparing multiple products, gift buyers.
Match the intent of readers looking for the best options in a category, use Product schema for each item, keep updated.
The workspace runs a checklist over the finished draft and shows you the result. It reports; it does not gate. Publishing remains your decision.
Every generation runs the first four stages automatically. Source review, citation rendering and publishing are steps you take in the Quill workspace.
GenerationPlanner.csPromptBuilder.csGenerationExecutor.csPostGenerationPipeline.csEditableSourcesPanel.razorCitationHtmlRenderer.csStart in the real Quill writing workflow. No credit card required.
Start 14-day trialInside Quill
Updated