Sources and proof guide
Learn how Gixo adds source notes that point back to your files, so readers — and reviewers — can see where each fact came from.
Quill article review: compare a saved draft with selected sources
Find passages that need a closer look before publication. Compare a saved draft with selected source documents and review advisory findings beside quoted evidence, including contradictions, unsupported assertions, calculations, missing conditions, and changed numbers or units.
Prepared example. These invented pilot figures demonstrate an editorial decision; they are not a customer result or a recorded Quill run.
- Source: “In a UK pilot during May 2026, median handling time fell from 12 to 9 minutes across 120 tickets.”
- Draft: “All customers cut handling time by 30%.”
- Review concern: the universal scope and percentage exceed the selected source. Check the draft and source quotations; a model finding still needs an editor's decision.
- Correction: “In the May 2026 UK pilot of 120 tickets, median handling time fell 25%, from 12 to 9 minutes.”
- Finish: save the correction, rerun review for the changed passages, and review the article and its publication metadata before approving that saved revision.
Publish the version your team approved. Approve an exact saved revision, then send its frozen release. Workspace owners can require approval for live publication; Quill checks the release against required sources, reviewed facts, policy, and revocation before delivery.
The publication policy is optional in the app. Later draft edits do not rewrite an earlier frozen release; its own source, fact, policy and approval checks still apply. A review may be incomplete when sources are unreadable, the review window is exceeded or quotations cannot be verified. Neither verified quotations nor approval establish that the source itself is true.
Separate deterministic quality checks from source review · Set review responsibilities and fact freshness
Refresh content when the facts change
Keep the prior article and the new source material available to the editor. Identify the changed claims, revise the copy, rerun source review and mechanical checks, and approve the new saved revision where your publication policy requires it. A derivative refresh creates a new copy so existing edits are preserved; verify the destination workflow before replacing an already published post.
The Business brief source-note workflow described below is separate from Quill's saved-article review.
Sources and proof features
Six things that make a brief easier to trust and double-check.
When you upload files, Gixo adds numbered source notes to the claims it takes from them, each pointing to a file in the Sources list. A cited claim can be traced back to the document it came from.
A cited percentage, financial figure or statistic points to the document it was taken from, so a reviewer can check it at the source instead of hunting for it.
Citations point to the source document the information came from, listed in the Sources section. Readers can check a cited claim by following the reference back to that document.
Source notes next to cited claims show readers which statements are tied back to your uploaded proof. A statement without one is not tied to a file, so it is the first thing to check.
The checking flow runs through several steps, from reading your files to checking numbers against them, adding source notes when you upload files, and shaping the final brief.
The Sources list is added to the brief itself as a numbered list under a Sources heading, so it takes the brief's own formatting and exports with it. Gixo does not rewrite source notes to match your tone.
How it works
Five steps from source upload to a brief with source notes.
Upload PDFs, DOCX files, or web URLs as source material. Gixo reads every file and makes it easy to search during brief creation.
The AI drafts from the text extracted from every source document, and a separate check then pulls candidate facts, statistics, quotes, and data points out of that text. Each is kept with the name of the file it came from; a brief records no page number or section for it, so confirm a figure in the file itself.
Gixo does not independently verify facts — it surfaces the sources so you can. Extracted facts stay attached to the file they came from, so a reviewer can confirm each number at the source before the draft goes anywhere. A Business brief built from files you upload runs an extra reconciliation stage that rewrites a sentence whose figure it cannot find in those files, and its Evidence tab then lists the sentences the check still could not match. Both compare the draft against your own sources; neither establishes that the sources are right, and nothing is marked up in the brief itself.
Gixo adds inline source notes for supported claims. Each note is a number that points to a file in the Sources list, so readers can trace a claim back to the document it came from.
The final brief shows inline source notes and a source list, so claims point back to your uploaded files and any figure can be traced to the document it came from.
Frequently Asked Questions
Updated