Create a decision guide with criteria, evidence, options, trade-offs, scenarios, scoring logic, and a qualified recommendation. The active guide targets 2,200 words, asks the model for 10 structural elements and then checks the draft for them, binds sources after generation, and keeps review before export.
Details
| Topic | Details | What to know |
|---|---|---|
| Target length | Approximately 2,200 words | Designed for the depth and reading experience expected from this format. |
| Required structure | 10 required elements | Requested in the prompt, then reported as detected or missing on the workspace checklist. |
| Tone and voice | Analytical, structured, and decision-enabling; Active voice | Keeps the writing style aligned with the selected format. |
| Audience | Decision makers, comparison shoppers, analytical thinkers, anyone facing difficult choices. | Shapes the draft for the people most likely to read and use it. |
| Source handling | Post-generation claim extraction and source binding | Lets you review claims and connect citations without inventing sources in the draft. |
| Delivery | 2 direct publishing targets; PDF, DOCX, HTML, Markdown, TXT, and JSON | Export the finished content or publish it through a connected destination. |
Provide the decision, stakeholders, available options, criteria and weights, evidence sources, constraints, scenarios, risks, and conditions that should trigger a different choice.
The active guide targets approximately 2,200 words and injects 10 required structural elements using a analytical, structured, and decision-enabling tone for decision makers, comparison shoppers, analytical thinkers, anyone facing difficult choices..
Yes. The Decision Guide opens in the Quill workspace for editing and team review. You can bind sources after generation, render APA, MLA, Chicago, or Harvard citations, export in PDF, DOCX, HTML, Markdown, TXT, and JSON, or publish to a supported CMS destination.
An AI decision guide generator structures a complex choice so readers can reach their own defensible conclusion. It defines criteria, compares options, exposes trade-offs, tests scenarios, and explains how different priorities change the recommendation.
What to provide: Provide the decision, stakeholders, available options, criteria and weights, evidence sources, constraints, scenarios, risks, and conditions that should trigger a different choice.
The Decision Guide style guide below is read from the Gixo source at request time. Most of it is written into the generation prompt to steer the draft. A smaller part is enforced by code after the model answers. The editorial judgments stay with you — so they are listed separately rather than folded into one promise.
These are instructions, not checks. They shape what the model is asked to produce; nothing afterwards verifies that the tone landed or that the draft suits the audience. That is what step 3 is for.
Introduction & Decision Framework, Understanding Your Needs, Option A: Detailed Analysis, Option B: Detailed Analysis, Option C: Detailed Analysis, Decision Criteria & Weighting, Scenario-Based Recommendations, Decision Matrix, Making the Final Choice
Analytical, structured, and decision-enabling · Active voice
Decision makers, comparison shoppers, analytical thinkers, anyone facing difficult choices.
Target 'how to decide' and 'decision guide' keywords, use decision tree schema, provide clear recommendations.
The workspace runs a checklist over the finished draft and shows you the result. It reports; it does not gate. Publishing remains your decision.
Every generation passes through a deterministic 7-stage pipeline.
GenerationPlanner.csPromptBuilder.csGenerationExecutor.csPostGenerationPipeline.csEvidencePipeline.csCitationHtmlRenderer.csStart in the real Quill writing workflow. No credit card required.
Start 14-day trialInside Quill
