Gamma vs Gixo

An honest, in-depth comparison of Gamma and Gixo for AI-generated presentations. We break down features, pricing, design philosophy, export options, and collaboration so you can pick the tool that actually fits your workflow.

40+ Gixo Slides Per Deck
20+ Gixo Themes
PDF Full Export
AI Per-Slide Regeneration

Detailed Feature Comparison

A head-to-head breakdown of every feature that matters when choosing between Gamma and Gixo. We have marked areas where each tool leads.

Feature Gixo Gamma
AI deck generationFull deck from topicCard-based generation
Max slides per deck40+Limited
Professional themes20+ curated themesBasic templates
Slide formatTraditional slidesDocument-style cards
PDF exportFull quality PDFLimited / paid
AI image generationBuilt-in per slideLimited
Per-slide editingFull controlPartial editing
Per-slide AI regenerationYesNo
Present modeFull-screen with controlsYes
Speaker notesYesYes
Keyboard navigationYesYes
No design skills neededYesYes
Real-time collaborationComing soonReal-time co-editing
Web embeddingNot availableEmbed anywhere
Custom brandingVia theme selectionBrand kit (paid)
Free tierNo free tierGenerous free plan
PricingFrom $9.99/moFree / Pro $10/mo
Analytics and trackingNot availableView tracking (paid)
Offline accessPDF works offlineWeb-only

Key Differences Between Gamma and Gixo

Both tools use AI to generate presentations, but they take fundamentally different approaches to format, output, and audience.

Slide Format

Gamma uses document-style cards that scroll vertically, making it feel more like a web page than a slideshow. Gixo creates discrete, traditional slides designed for full-screen presentations in boardrooms, conferences, and classrooms.

Deck Length

Gixo generates decks with 40 or more slides from a single topic, suitable for comprehensive investor decks, training materials, and executive briefings. Gamma focuses on shorter, snappier card sets optimized for quick consumption.

Theme Library

Gixo offers 20+ professionally designed themes with coordinated typography, colors, and layout patterns that apply consistently across every slide. Gamma provides basic templates and a style system, but fewer purpose-built presentation themes.

Export Options

Gixo offers unrestricted PDF export, individual slide images, and HTML format on all paid plans. Gamma restricts PDF export to paid tiers and adds watermarks on its free plan, though its web sharing link is excellent for async distribution.

Collaboration

Gamma has a clear lead here with real-time co-editing, comments, and team workspaces built in. Gixo currently focuses on individual creation and export. If your team needs to co-author presentations together, Gamma is the better pick today.

AI Regeneration

Gixo lets you regenerate individual slides with AI while preserving the rest of your deck. This granular control means you can refine one weak slide without rebuilding the entire presentation, a workflow that Gamma does not currently support.

Understanding the Core Design Philosophy

The most important difference between Gamma and Gixo is not a single feature. It is the fundamental approach each tool takes to what a presentation should be.

Gamma: A Document-First Approach

Gamma treats presentations as living web documents. Its cards scroll vertically, embed media inline, and are designed to be consumed the same way you would read a webpage or a Notion doc. This makes Gamma outstanding for asynchronous sharing. You can generate a Gamma deck, copy the link, drop it in a Slack channel, and your team scrolls through it at their own pace. There is no need for a presenter to walk through the content. The format is self-explanatory and web-native.

Gamma also supports embedding directly into websites, wikis, and learning management systems. If your goal is to create visual content that lives on the web and gets shared via links, Gamma's architecture is purpose-built for that workflow. Its collaboration features, including real-time co-editing and commenting, reinforce this document-first philosophy.

Gixo: A Presentation-First Approach

Gixo treats presentations as structured slide decks meant to be delivered in person or projected on a screen. Each slide is a discrete unit with its own layout, theme styling, and visual hierarchy. The result is a deck that feels familiar to anyone who has used PowerPoint, Keynote, or Google Slides, but generated in minutes by AI instead of hours by hand.

This approach is optimized for live delivery. Gixo decks have a full-screen present mode, keyboard navigation, and a traditional slide-by-slide flow. When you export to PDF, each page maps cleanly to one slide. When you stand in front of a board of directors or walk on stage at a conference, the format works exactly as the audience expects.

Neither Is Universally Better

It is tempting to declare one tool the winner, but the reality is more nuanced. If you spend most of your time sharing visual updates asynchronously via Slack, email, or internal wikis, Gamma's web-native card format and collaboration tools are genuinely hard to beat. If you regularly present live in meetings, conferences, or investor pitches, Gixo's traditional slide format, comprehensive themes, and unrestricted PDF export are better suited to that context.

Many professionals use both depending on the situation. The question is not which tool is better in the abstract, but which tool is better for the specific way you present and share information today.

Which Tool Fits Your Use Case?

The best tool depends on the context. Here are six common scenarios and our honest recommendation for each.

Board Meeting or Investor Pitch
Recommendation: Gixo. Investor decks and board presentations demand a traditional slide format, professional themes, and clean PDF export. Gixo generates 40+ slide decks with structured layouts that work in formal settings. Export to PDF and present offline without worrying about internet access or browser compatibility.
Internal Team Update Shared via Slack
Recommendation: Gamma. When you just need to share a quick visual update with your team, Gamma's web-native cards are ideal. Drop a link in Slack and everyone scrolls through at their own pace. No need for a formal presentation session, no file downloads, and no scheduling a meeting.
Conference Keynote or Workshop
Recommendation: Gixo. Conferences require full-screen present mode, consistent slide transitions, and a format that fills a projector screen cleanly. Gixo's discrete slides and keyboard navigation make it straightforward to deliver a polished keynote without the scrolling format that card-based tools produce.
Sales Proposal or Client Deck
Recommendation: Gixo. Sales proposals need branded, professional slides that can be exported as PDF attachments for email follow-ups. Gixo's 20+ themes and full PDF export make it easy to generate a polished proposal deck that looks intentional and consistent from the first slide to the last.
Classroom or Educational Content
Recommendation: Gamma. Educators sharing content through a learning management system benefit from Gamma's embed support and interactive card format. Students can scroll through material at their own pace, and the content integrates directly into platforms like Canvas or Google Classroom without file downloads.
Quick Brainstorm or Idea Sharing
Recommendation: Gamma. For rapid ideation where speed matters more than polish, Gamma's free tier and fast card generation are hard to beat. You can throw together a visual concept in minutes and share it for collaborative feedback without any cost or commitment.

Pricing Comparison

A transparent look at what each tool costs and what you get at each tier.

Gamma Pricing

  • Free: Limited AI credits, Gamma watermark on exports, basic templates. The free tier is genuinely useful for casual use and trying the product before committing.
  • Pro ($10/month): Unlimited AI generation, no watermark, PDF export, custom fonts, and priority support.
  • Business ($20/month): Everything in Pro plus analytics, brand kits, team workspaces, and advanced collaboration features.

Gixo Pricing

  • From $9.99/month: Full access to 40+ slide generation, 20+ professional themes, complete PDF export, AI image generation, and per-slide regeneration. No watermarks on any paid plan.

Which Offers Better Value?

If you want to try an AI presentation tool without paying anything, Gamma's free tier is the obvious starting point. It is generous enough for occasional use and lets you evaluate the card-based format before committing. For professionals who need full-featured presentation creation, both tools land in a similar price range around ten dollars per month. Gixo includes AI image generation and unrestricted PDF export at its base tier, while Gamma reserves some features like analytics and brand kits for its higher-priced Business plan.

The pricing difference is not dramatic enough to be the deciding factor. Choose based on whether you need traditional slides (Gixo) or web-native cards (Gamma), and the pricing will follow.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for professional presentations, Gamma or Gixo?
For traditional professional presentations used in boardrooms, conferences, and formal settings, Gixo is the stronger choice. It creates standard slide-format decks with 40+ slides, 20+ professional themes, and full PDF export. Gamma's card-based format works better for informal sharing and web-based storytelling.
Can Gixo generate longer presentations than Gamma?
Yes. Gixo generates presentations with 40 or more slides from a single topic, making it suitable for in-depth training, executive briefings, and comprehensive presentations. Gamma's card-based approach focuses on shorter, more concise visual summaries.
Does Gamma have better collaboration features than Gixo?
Yes. Gamma currently offers real-time co-editing, comments, and team workspaces, making it the better choice if multiple people need to work on the same presentation simultaneously. Gixo focuses on individual creation and polished export, with collaboration features planned for future releases.
Is Gamma free to use?
Gamma offers a free tier with limited AI credits and a watermark on exports. It is generous enough for casual use and trying the platform. Gixo does not offer a free tier but starts at $9.99 per month with full features and no watermarks.
Does Gixo offer better export options than Gamma?
Gixo provides full PDF export, individual slide images, and HTML format without restrictions or watermarks on all paid plans. Gamma's export capabilities are more limited on free plans where PDF export may be restricted and watermarks are applied. On paid plans, both tools offer solid export options.
Which tool should I use for async sharing via Slack or email?
For asynchronous sharing, Gamma is generally the better pick. Its web-native card format lets recipients scroll through content in their browser without downloading files or scheduling a meeting. Gamma also supports embedding in websites and wikis, making it ideal for content that lives online.
Do I need design skills to use either tool?
Neither tool requires design skills. Both Gamma and Gixo use AI to generate presentations from a topic or content you provide. Gixo's 20+ professional themes ensure your deck looks polished without any manual design work, while Gamma's templates handle visual consistency for its card format.
Can I edit individual slides in Gixo after generation?
Yes. Gixo provides full per-slide editing, allowing you to change text, modify layouts, regenerate individual slides with AI, and add AI-generated images. You have complete control over every slide in your deck without affecting the rest of the presentation.

Try Gixo and See the Difference

Generate a complete, themed presentation in minutes. Compare the output to Gamma yourself and decide which format fits your workflow.

High Contrast Mode Disabled
An error has occurred. This application may no longer respond until reloaded. Reload 🗙